Listmates;
They say 3rd time is the charm, and so it was. On my 3rd install of
kde-unstable with an existing kdemod3 install, I have hit deduced a procedure
for doing it that will allow for the installation of kde-unstable without
conflict or the need to resort to any "unrecommended" fe
On Thursday 18 June 2009 02:55:56 pm David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> David C. Rankin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 16:57:37 hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:23:25 -0400
> >>
> >> Andrei Thorp wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of Wed Jun 17 15:17:24 -0400
>
Listmates,
Before filing a bug, I would like to see if anyone else can confirm
this
behavior with an i686 install. I installed kde-unstable which installed kdm
instead of kdm3. With kdm3 everything seemed OK. I could select kde or kde3 as
the session type and I could do a 'console logi
On Thursday 18 June 2009 02:11:48 pm David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote:
> Listmates:
>
> On my i686 box I am experiencing crashes for many of the default 'k'apps
> like konqueror, kmail, etc. I have provided the backtraces to kde.org. I
> went back and installed the kdemod3 kde3.5 to have acce
Baho Utot wrote:
I see that the i686 version of arch only sees 3.25G of the 8G installed.
Does the i686 kernel support PAE?
No it does not, but you can rebuild it yourself using ABS.
Allan
I see that the i686 version of arch only sees 3.25G of the 8G installed.
Does the i686 kernel support PAE?
I have not gotten to install X86_64 but I am working on it
Blame allan's script :)
Allan broke it!
On Jun 18, 2009 5:29 PM, "Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi"
wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote: > There are LOTS of packages in extra and community
that need rebuilds. > The o...
These package don't use readline
maxima
mono-debugger
koffice
And these are missing in this
Grigorios Bouzakis schrieb:
Just out of curiosity, why was that change made?
Isnt it a bit incosistent to all other *.d's? pacman.conf isnt in pacman.d,
logrotate.conf isnt in logrotate.d, rc.conf isnt in rc.d etc.
Are there plans to move those too?
In the past, they ignored /etc/modprobe.d whe
Oh, right. Sorry about that. :)
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Gerardo Exequiel
Pozzi wrote:
> André Ramaciotti wrote:
>> Maxima doesn't use by default, but if you run 'rmaxima', it uses.
>>
> Nope, rmaxima is a shell script that runs community/rlwrap. rlwrap is
> listed here: http://bugs.archli
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Allan McRae schrieb:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
The new module-init-tools 3.8 package changes the location of the
configuration file: /etc/modprobe.conf is no longer read, instead
/etc/modprobe.d/modp
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Allan McRae schrieb:
>
>> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>
>>> The new module-init-tools 3.8 package changes the location of the
>>> configuration file: /etc/modprobe.conf is no longer read, instead
>>> /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf is used. Files w
André Ramaciotti wrote:
> Maxima doesn't use by default, but if you run 'rmaxima', it uses.
>
Nope, rmaxima is a shell script that runs community/rlwrap. rlwrap is
listed here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15165
FILE /usr/bin/rlwrap
...
NEEDED libreadline.so.5
...
;)
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009
Maxima doesn't use by default, but if you run 'rmaxima', it uses.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Gerardo Exequiel
Pozzi wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> There are LOTS of packages in extra and community that need rebuilds.
>> The original output from Allan's script is as follows:
>> abiword-plug
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> There are LOTS of packages in extra and community that need rebuilds.
> The original output from Allan's script is as follows:
> abiword-plugins
> abook
> afterstep
> amule
> bc
> cdcd
> clisp
> ecasound
> evms
> fluidsynth
> freeciv
> fvwm
> fvwm-devel
> genius
> gftp
> gnok
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Gerardo Exequiel
> Pozzi wrote:
>> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>> So I finally pushed the core readline/bash packages to testing. The
>>> reason it took so long was a) a mkinitcpio issue which was fixed a few
>>> wee
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Gerardo Exequiel
Pozzi wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> So I finally pushed the core readline/bash packages to testing. The
>> reason it took so long was a) a mkinitcpio issue which was fixed a few
>> weeks in, and b) the fact that I couldn't keep up with the extra
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> So I finally pushed the core readline/bash packages to testing. The
> reason it took so long was a) a mkinitcpio issue which was fixed a few
> weeks in, and b) the fact that I couldn't keep up with the extra
> packages in my limited freetime.
>
> So, I've just built the core
Thank you Henning, I'll look into those options.
Quoting Henning Garus :
You might want to consider the conflict/provides stuff for vim anyway or you
should start to prepare yourself for the wrath of those who type vi and
expect vim...
I can handle that, the amount of wrath is quite amazing
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Pierre Schmitz
>> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 18 June 2009 18:12:05 Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> >> I'm going to slowly work through these throughout the d
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Pierre Schmitz
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 June 2009 18:12:05 Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> I'm going to slowly work through these throughout the day, but if
> >> someone can help, that'd be great.
> >>
> >> Let m
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>
> I think I'm going to just put the core packages in testing and get
> some help with the extra packages.
unless debian has pushed a new b
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 15:55, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> How are you getting any law work done with all this Linux tinkering?!?!?!?
> :-)
>
> DR
>
Where did you get the impression that lawyers worked? :D
David C. Rankin wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 16:57:37 hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:23:25 -0400
Andrei Thorp wrote:
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of Wed Jun 17 15:17:24 -0400
2009:
It's either "dazzle them with your brilliance" or "baffle them with
your bullsh
Listmates,
When configuring many of the individual desktop effects, there is a
field
called "Animation duration" or "Rotation duratio" (the cube) which are the
timing/delay (in miliseconds) for the effect transitions which is set
to "default". I have found the "default" to be incredibl
Listmates:
On my i686 box I am experiencing crashes for many of the default
'k'apps like
konqueror, kmail, etc. I have provided the backtraces to kde.org. I went back
and installed the kdemod3 kde3.5 to have access to the kde3.5 versions of the
same apps within kde4.3. I don't know if
2009/6/18, Nicolas Bigaouette :
> No, but that check box should disable it if there is any DRM in the pdf
> (which might not be the case for most pdf!)
>
> Maybe verify if the disk hosting /tmp is full? Try "df" to see if it is...
>
>
> 2009/6/14 prad
>
>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:12:52 +0200
>> Pie
Listmates,
What is the best way to get quanta+ on kde43? On the suse kde43
installs I
have both kde3.5 and kde43 b2 installed in parallel so I just use the kde3
quanta without issue. On Arch, I have installed kdemod3 in parallel with kde43
b2 and I can use quanta that way, but is that
Listmates,
Installed kde-unstable and it is looking good. A couple of
system-settings
crashes reported to kde.org (added to the existing bug).
One issue that I deal with with Beta 2 on both suse and Arch is the
kicker
panel not wanting to unhide when running compiz. Sometimes
On Thursday 18 June 2009 09:39:27 am David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> > Judging from the rest of your post (and some subsequent posts) it sounds
> > like this is some sort of weird conflict between the stock KDE packages
> > and the unstable ones.
>
> I guess you just have to
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Judging from the rest of your post (and some subsequent posts) it sounds
like this is some sort of weird conflict between the stock KDE packages
and the unstable ones.
I guess you just have to know going in about the potential for this kind
of aggravation when you're
David C. Rankin wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 19:13:54 David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On Wed, June 17, 2009 7:49 pm, David C. Rankin wrote:
So far, all packages for kde-unstable have been downloaded to the i686
box
when I tried to install kde-unstable with 'pacman -Sy kde kde-extragear'.
Excerpts from Loui Chang's message of Thu Jun 18 09:37:13 -0400 2009:
> What's Xandros development co-op?
I'm a student working for Xandros Corp as a software developer.
> Haha. Did you notice your signature is 10x the length of your reply?
Fix't ;)
--
Andrei Thorp, Developer: Xandros Corp. (ht
On Wed 17 Jun 2009 16:07 -0400, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Excerpts from Tim Gelter's message of Wed Jun 17 15:49:46 -0400 2009:
> > Looks like Chris Mason (the lead BTRFS developer @ Oracle) is a fan of Arch
> > Linux... :)
>
> Woot. Arch for the win, of course :D
> --
> Andrei Thorp
> Development C
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of Thu Jun 18 02:06:02 -0400 2009:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 14:23:25 Andrei Thorp wrote:
> > Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of Wed Jun 17 15:17:24 -0400 2009:
> > > It's either "dazzle them with your brilliance" or "baffle them with your
> > > bul
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of Thu Jun 18 03:25:08 -0400 2009:
> I got it, but what I had to do was remove kdemultimedia, then install kb3.
> Then when I went to install kdemultimedia again it said "use kde-meta-
> mutimedia for kdemultimedia, and I just said OK and it seems fine now.
No, but that check box should disable it if there is any DRM in the pdf
(which might not be the case for most pdf!)
Maybe verify if the disk hosting /tmp is full? Try "df" to see if it is...
2009/6/14 prad
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:12:52 +0200
> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>
> > Did you disable DRM
On Thursday 18 June 2009 01:49:30 David C. Rankin wrote:
> WTF This is a BUG, there isn't a damn thing installed and still I get
> 2 lines of conflicts The same conflicts. OK, let's disable
> kdemod- legacy in pacman and try once again.
If you would have read my last mail you woul
On Thursday 18 June 2009 01:25:49 Guilherme M. Nogueira wrote:
> Oh, damn Just read your message again...
> Should've payed more attention.
>
> I just checked.. It seems that in kde-unstable kdemultimedia is a
> package group and in extra it is a real package.
> Well, I don't know how pacman ha
On Thursday 18 June 2009 01:48:50 ludovic coues wrote:
> look at package directory, and try to see if there is any leftover
> after have removed kde.
> There should be none, be there should be no bug too.
>
I still think there may be a bug here. I had to iteratively remove packages
even after the
On Thursday 18 June 2009 01:18:47 Guilherme M. Nogueira wrote:
> It seems that pacman is trying to install kdemultimedia from extra. I
> believe that pacman takes the order in which repos appear in
> pacman.conf as priority.
>
> If you have extra enabled before kde-unstable, then pacman will find
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
