On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:29:36 +0700
Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Allan McRae
> wrote:
> > Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Allan McRae
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I have built ruby-1.9.1 for [testing]. As far as I
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 17:39 -0700, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Well, for example:
>
> Reason.garoth ~: pkgfile gtkdocize
> extra/gtk-doc
>
> It'll find pretty much anything. If you're looking for an executable,
> it's often better to "pkgfile bin/gtkdocize" -- pkgfile is a grep
> frontend or something
Well, for example:
Reason.garoth ~: pkgfile gtkdocize
extra/gtk-doc
It'll find pretty much anything. If you're looking for an executable,
it's often better to "pkgfile bin/gtkdocize" -- pkgfile is a grep
frontend or something like that.
-AT
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 17:25 -0700, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Consider using pkgfile from pkgtools to answer these kinds of questions.
>
> -AT
I don't understand what you are saying?
I will look at that package
adding gtk-doc to the makedepends allows it to compile
Thank you
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:32 PM, clemens
fischer wrote:
> Andrei Thorp wrote:
>
>> Well, as far as I can tell, the problem is that this requires the
>> updating of the 4050 packages we have at the moment. All of them. By
>> hand. For rather limited gain.
>
> Well, you don't get it as far as I can te
Consider using pkgfile from pkgtools to answer these kinds of questions.
-AT
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 01:55 +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On 09/06/2009, Baho Utot wrote:
> > I am trying to build libgweather and I have this error
> >
> > PKGBUILD: line 24: gtkdocize: command not found
> >
> > What is gtkdocize
> >
> > and where do I find it?
> extra/gtk-doc
>
Thank you
I
On 09/06/2009, Baho Utot wrote:
> I am trying to build libgweather and I have this error
>
> PKGBUILD: line 24: gtkdocize: command not found
>
> What is gtkdocize
>
> and where do I find it?
extra/gtk-doc
--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
I am trying to build libgweather and I have this error
PKGBUILD: line 24: gtkdocize: command not found
What is gtkdocize
and where do I find it?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM, clemens
fischer wrote:
> Andrei Thorp wrote:
>
>> Well, as far as I can tell, the problem is that this requires the
>> updating of the 4050 packages we have at the moment. All of them. By
>> hand. For rather limited gain.
>
> Well, you don't get it as far as I can te
Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Well, as far as I can tell, the problem is that this requires the
> updating of the 4050 packages we have at the moment. All of them. By
> hand. For rather limited gain.
Well, you don't get it as far as I can tell. As all paths stay the
same, _not one single package_ has to
Daenyth Blank wrote:
> -1. It's really not needed, pacman does plenty. And we should stick to
> the FHS when possible.
Keeping with norms is almost always good, but putting package files into
their own directories and linking to them from the standard FHS places
doesn't violate the FHS. Unless t
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:33:28AM -0400, Eduardo Romero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The first time I inform here that the Arch Linux newsletter is out,
> the June edition is a special one, it contains the article, about the
> stolen logo. So please, guys, go ahead and digg that article, so we
> get more cov
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>> David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, the way I have my setup configured is that all my email - both in
>>> and out - goes through my home server. My server uses fetchmail to grab
>>> incoming mail from the
I translate this page, but I'm beginner, I would like to review.
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Table_of_Contents_(Portugu%C3%AAs_do_Brasil)
Thank you.
Magnus Therning wrote:
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Well, the way I have my setup configured is that all my email - both in
and out - goes through my home server. My server uses fetchmail to grab
incoming mail from the ISP, dovecot to provide IMAP capabilities on my
server, and exim with smart hos
-1. It's really not needed, pacman does plenty. And we should stick to
the FHS when possible.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Alessandro Doro wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:24:16PM -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>> And done all posible renames of tasks to the form "[pkgname] the title".
>> Bugtracker now looks much more orderly. and the function "Bug Reports"
>> from package view
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, clemens
fischer wrote:
> Andrei Thorp wrote:
>
>> Also, remaking all packages in the repos to do this?
>
> Where's the problem? The symlinking can be done at leisure, on routine
> updates. They are compatible.
Well, as far as I can tell, the problem is that this
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:24:16PM -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> And done all posible renames of tasks to the form "[pkgname] the title".
> Bugtracker now looks much more orderly. and the function "Bug Reports"
> from package view page, works better :)
> In the last week more than 100 old
20 matches
Mail list logo
