On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 04:05:56PM -0700, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Also, remaking all packages in the repos to do this? Erk. No thanks,
> Mr. Spillypants.
>
> -AT
>
> (PS. perhaps you folks haven't seen the Keith's Beer commercials where
> the guy keeps calling people Mr. Spillypants. Turns out that
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
OK, I understand the reason. So the wiki page maybe needs to be update
[#1] "Bug Squshing Day takes place during _*the first Sunday of every
month*._".
[#1] http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bug_Squashing_Day
Well, It could take place that often if there was m
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Going into testing in a few minutes:
>
> mkinitcpio changes:
> - Finally fix a bug where required HID modules were missing
> - Add a new COMPRESSION option that accepts gzip, lzma and bzip2
> parameters (gzip is the default, the others are only supported on
> 2.6.30 and late
Sébastien Duquette wrote:
> +1 and kudos to Gerardo!
>
> Sebastien
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>>> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>>>
And done all posible renames of tasks to the form "[p
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Zé Ninguém wrote:
> Hi there.
> I am having some file conflicts when upgrading the licenses package, and I
> don't understand why?
> Here is the error:
>
> resolving dependencies...
> looking for inter-conflicts...
>
> Targets (1): licenses-2.5-1
>
> Total Download S
Hi there.
I am having some file conflicts when upgrading the licenses package, and I
don't understand why?
Here is the error:
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (1): licenses-2.5-1
Total Download Size:0.00 MB
Total Installed Size: 0.46 MB
Proceed with install
+1 and kudos to Gerardo!
Sebastien
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>>>
>>> And done all posible renames of tasks to the form "[pkgname] the title".
>>> Bugtracker now looks much more or
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Roman Kyrylych wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 16:41, Dan McGee wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Pierre Schmitz
>>> wrote:
>>>
Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 14:14:48 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
>
> If everythin
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>>
>> And done all posible renames of tasks to the form "[pkgname] the title".
>> Bugtracker now looks much more orderly. and the function "Bug Reports"
>> from package view page, works better :)
>> In the last week
Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Also, remaking all packages in the repos to do this?
Where's the problem? The symlinking can be done at leisure, on routine
updates. They are compatible.
clemens
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> clemens fischer wrote:
>> /usr/local/bin/gpp -> /opt/gpp/2.24/bin/gpp*
>> /usr/local/man/man1/gpp.1 -> /opt/gpp/2.24/man/man1/gpp.1
>> ...
>>
>> [1] http://www.rpcurnow.force9.co.uk/spill/
>
> Maybe GoboLinux is for you http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoboLinux
Ah, I
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have built ruby-1.9.1 for [testing]. As far as I can tell, the only
>>> thing that is broken is gvim. A dev who uses that will want
Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
I have built ruby-1.9.1 for [testing]. As far as I can tell, the only
thing that is broken is gvim. A dev who uses that will want to look into
fixing it... I hear there is a patch floating around for ruby
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have built ruby-1.9.1 for [testing]. As far as I can tell, the only
> thing that is broken is gvim. A dev who uses that will want to look into
> fixing it... I hear there is a patch floating around for ruby-1.9 support
> but no
14 matches
Mail list logo
