Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
And done all posible renames of tasks to the form "[pkgname] the title".
Bugtracker now looks much more orderly. and the function "Bug Reports"
from package view page, works better :)
In the last week more than 100 old task was closed :)
There are plans in mind for
Also, remaking all packages in the repos to do this? Erk. No thanks,
Mr. Spillypants.
-AT
(PS. perhaps you folks haven't seen the Keith's Beer commercials where
the guy keeps calling people Mr. Spillypants. Turns out that the actor
for those commercials was later arrested for child porn and the
c
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:19 PM, clemens
fischer wrote:
> The advantage is easy to see: you can always see what package some file
> belongs to,
pacman -Qo /path/to/file
>and removing a package is as simple as removing matching
> links and the installation directory.
pacman -R pkgname
> All fi
clemens fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whenever I install autotools-aware programs from source, they don't go
> into /usr/local as is customary, but into their own directory called
> /opt//, and then files in
> /opt///{{s,}bin,man} etc. get symlinked into their
> counterparts in /usr/local. I am using s
Hi,
Whenever I install autotools-aware programs from source, they don't go
into /usr/local as is customary, but into their own directory called
/opt//, and then files in
/opt///{{s,}bin,man} etc. get symlinked into their
counterparts in /usr/local. I am using spill[1] for this.
Thus, for gpp-2.2
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 16:41 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> > How long does it take for the updated PKGBUILD to hit abs after a bug
> > report is closed
> >
> > For example if the PKGBUILD is missing a dependency?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
>
> The abs
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> How long does it take for the updated PKGBUILD to hit abs after a bug
> report is closed
>
> For example if the PKGBUILD is missing a dependency?
>
> Thanks
>
>
The abs tree is updated every day so it could take up to one day.
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>
>> Hi guys.
>> quite a lot of bug assigning happened lately, could you please add:
>> [packagename] ...
>> at the beginning of each bug topic,
>> this way it's much easier to sort things on bugtracker.
>>
>> thanks
>> greetings
>> tpow
How long does it take for the updated PKGBUILD to hit abs after a bug
report is closed
For example if the PKGBUILD is missing a dependency?
Thanks
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On Sat, June 6, 2009 7:01 am, Magnus Therning wrote:
Why do you _need_ an SMTP server?
From the sounds of it you could use your ISP's server directly from the
laptop via the VPN connection. Either that, or as another poster
suggested,
use SSH port forwarding to get to
On Sat, June 6, 2009 7:01 am, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Why do you _need_ an SMTP server?
> From the sounds of it you could use your ISP's server directly from the
> laptop via the VPN connection. Either that, or as another poster
> suggested,
> use SSH port forwarding to get to the SMTP server.
>
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On Fri, June 5, 2009 6:23 pm, Magnus Therning wrote:
Mike Sampson wrote:
I have used msmtp. From memory it just consists of a command line
utility
and a config file containing the mail server you want to use,
credentials if
used, etc. Worked well for me. There are quit
>
> Just curious, by the way: msmtp isn't exactly an SMTP "server", correct?
> It's really just a sendmail replacement, right? (i.e., not a full-fledged
> SMTP daemon, listening on port 25, etc.)
>
> DR
>
>
Correct. It is just a command line tool that talks to an smtp server. That
was all I neede
13 matches
Mail list logo
