Re: [arch-general] libnl 1.1-1 i686

2009-05-25 Thread Baho Utot
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:36 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Baho Utot schrieb: > > Source package URL gone > > > > => Making package: libnl 1.1-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:16 UTC 2009) > > ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... > > ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... > > ==> Retrieving Sources... > >

Re: [arch-general] libnl 1.1-1 i686

2009-05-25 Thread Thomas Bächler
Baho Utot schrieb: Source package URL gone => Making package: libnl 1.1-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:16 UTC 2009) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Downloading libnl-1.1.tar.gz... --2009-05-25 18:31:17-- http://people.suug.ch/~

Re: [arch-general] run-parts source URL bad

2009-05-25 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Baho Utot wrote: > ==> Making package: run-parts 2.31-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:59 UTC 2009) > ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... > ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... > ==> Retrieving Sources... >  -> Downloading debianutils_2.31.tar.gz... > --2009-05-25 18:3

[arch-general] run-parts source URL bad

2009-05-25 Thread Baho Utot
==> Making package: run-parts 2.31-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:59 UTC 2009) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Downloading debianutils_2.31.tar.gz... --2009-05-25 18:31:59-- http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/debianutils/deb

Re: [arch-general] licenses 2.4-1 - MD5SUM error

2009-05-25 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On 25/05/2009, Baho Utot wrote: > ==> Making package: licenses 2.4-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:20 UTC 2009) > > . > > ==> Validating source files with md5sums... > LICENSE-2.0.txt ... Passed > cc-by-3.0.txt ... Passed > cc-by-nc-3.0.txt ... Passed > cc-by-nc-nd-3.0.txt ... Passed

[arch-general] lilo 22.8-3 - compile - latest gcc

2009-05-25 Thread Baho Utot
==> Making package: lilo 22.8-3 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:24 UTC 2009) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Using cached copy of lilo-22.8.src.tar.gz -> Using cached copy of gcc-44.patch -> Using cached copy of lilo.conf ==> WAR

[arch-general] libnl 1.1-1 i686

2009-05-25 Thread Baho Utot
Source package URL gone => Making package: libnl 1.1-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:16 UTC 2009) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Downloading libnl-1.1.tar.gz... --2009-05-25 18:31:17-- http://people.suug.ch/~tgr/libnl/files/libnl

[arch-general] licenses 2.4-1 - MD5SUM error

2009-05-25 Thread Baho Utot
==> Making package: licenses 2.4-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:20 UTC 2009) . ==> Validating source files with md5sums... LICENSE-2.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nc-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nc-nd-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nc-sa-3.0.txt ... Passed cc-by-nd-3

Re: [arch-general] vi again

2009-05-25 Thread Baho Utot
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 00:46 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:26:56PM +, Baho Utot wrote: > > > > I am trying to build vi in core.any one have a patch to make it > > compile without me preforming surgery on the PKGBUILD and bash scripts? > > > > Thanks > > >

Re: [arch-general] vi again

2009-05-25 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:26:56PM +, Baho Utot wrote: > > I am trying to build vi in core.any one have a patch to make it > compile without me preforming surgery on the PKGBUILD and bash scripts? > > Thanks > This is what im building, replacing vi and vim in one. After all vi in core w

Re: [arch-general] xorg crash with setxkbmap frequently use

2009-05-25 Thread Rogutės Sparnuotos
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: >> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469572 >> [2] http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20081 > > Thanks for the useful information, Rogutės! > > Probably instead of using setxkbmap in shell script I'll write a simple >

[arch-general] vi again

2009-05-25 Thread Baho Utot
I am trying to build vi in core.any one have a patch to make it compile without me preforming surgery on the PKGBUILD and bash scripts? Thanks

Re: [arch-general] namcap

2009-05-25 Thread Baho Utot
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:07 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:50 +, Baho Utot wrote: > > I tried namcap a freshly built fakeroot from the latest abs sync > > [putolin] > Note that namcap isn't the holy grail, it's used to detect direct > linking dependency. Besides u

Re: [arch-general] namcap

2009-05-25 Thread Jan de Groot
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:50 +, Baho Utot wrote: > I tried namcap a freshly built fakeroot from the latest abs sync > > Here is what it said > > namcap fakeroot-1.12.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz > fakeroot E: Dependency detected and not included (bash) from files > ['usr/bin/fakeroot

Re: [arch-general] namcap

2009-05-25 Thread Allan McRae
Baho Utot wrote: I tried namcap a freshly built fakeroot from the latest abs sync Here is what it said namcap fakeroot-1.12.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz fakeroot E: Dependency detected and not included (bash) from files ['usr/bin/fakeroot'] fakeroot W: Dependency included but alrea

[arch-general] namcap

2009-05-25 Thread Baho Utot
I tried namcap a freshly built fakeroot from the latest abs sync Here is what it said namcap fakeroot-1.12.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz fakeroot E: Dependency detected and not included (bash) from files ['usr/bin/fakeroot'] fakeroot W: Dependency included but already satisfied (glibc)