Baho Utot wrote:
> FWIW Sunbird compile fails on gcc-4.40
>
> nsAppRunner.cpp
> nsAppRunner.cpp:1373:6: error: #elif with no expression
>
>
Easy to fix:
Just replace the #elif that don't have an argument with an #else [#1] ;)
Good Luck!
[#1] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/porting_to.html
--
Ger
Baho Utot wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 20:59 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 15:59, Baho Utot wrote:
I am looking for a calander program like the one in evolution but is a
standalone or web based
Any Suggestions?
If you want CLI, calcurse isn't bad
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 20:59 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 15:59, Baho Utot wrote:
> > I am looking for a calander program like the one in evolution but is a
> > standalone or web based
> >
> > Any Suggestions?
> >
> >
>
> If you want CLI, calcurse isn't bad
Thanks,
FWIW
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 15:59, Baho Utot wrote:
> I am looking for a calander program like the one in evolution but is a
> standalone or web based
>
> Any Suggestions?
>
>
If you want CLI, calcurse isn't bad
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 21:20 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > I am looking for a calander program like the one in evolution but is a
> > standalone or web based
> >
> > Any Suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
> Hi Baho
>
> Maybe this is you are searching:
> http://aur.archlinux.
Baho Utot wrote:
> I am looking for a calander program like the one in evolution but is a
> standalone or web based
>
> Any Suggestions?
>
>
>
Hi Baho
Maybe this is you are searching:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6113 [ community/sunbird ]
Good Luck!
--
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi (
I am looking for a calander program like the one in evolution but is a
standalone or web based
Any Suggestions?
pan is crashing when I try to send a reply to any news group
This is the bug report from bug-buddy
System: Linux 2.6.29-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat May 9 12:47:43 UTC 2009
i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10601000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Th
> I have installed acpid, but acpid will not start and gives the
> following
> error:
>
> [10:24 alchemy:/home/david] # /etc/rc.d/acpid start
> :: Starting acpid [BUSY]
> acpid: can't open /proc/acpi/event: Device or resource busy
>
Listmates,
I am chasing down an issue with the radeonhd driver to force
downclocking of
the gpu. In my Xog.0.log I am receiving the message:
(WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory)
I have installed acpid, but acpid will not start and gives the
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 15:25 +0200, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> Does anyone know why the i686 version of libdrm is stuck at version
> 2.4.9 (the x86_64 is up-to-date at 2.4.11)?
> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libdrm
>
> I don't mind it much, since I've compiled my own package, but each
> ti
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 03:25:37PM +0200, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> Does anyone know why the i686 version of libdrm is stuck at version
> 2.4.9 (the x86_64 is up-to-date at 2.4.11)?
> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libdrm
>
> I don't mind it much, since I've compiled my own package, but ea
Does anyone know why the i686 version of libdrm is stuck at version
2.4.9 (the x86_64 is up-to-date at 2.4.11)?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libdrm
I don't mind it much, since I've compiled my own package, but each
time I try to -Syu pacman wants to downgrade to 2.4.9 and it's a bit
annoyi
Hi I try to build digikam 0.10 on archlinux.
I have kdegraphics 4.2.3-1 installed and still can't compile digikam
sudo abs
cp -r /var/abs/extra/digikam/ /tmp
cd /tmp/digikam/
makepkg PKGBUILD
-- The C compiler identification is GNU
-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU
-- Check for working C
2009/5/20 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. :
> On or about Tuesday 19 May 2009 at approximately 03:33:03 bardo composed:
>> 2009/5/18 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. :
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I think this may be your problem. I searched some time ago and fo
Thanks to everyone who gave a look at this. Just to narrow it down a
bit, it does happen with 1.9.1 branch (Firefox 3.5) and
mozilla-central branch only (binaries and local builds) while current
Firefox in Arch repo does work properly. Lastly, I'm also running
[testing] so that's not what makes the
Magnus Therning wrote:
I just recently bothered reading part of pacman's man page and found
that I probably should have performed a `pacman -U --asdeps
mypkg.tar.gz` as I installed dependencies for packages I build
manually. However I didn't, so can I retro-actively change the
reason-for-install
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I just recently bothered reading part of pacman's man page and found
> that I probably should have performed a `pacman -U --asdeps
> mypkg.tar.gz` as I installed dependencies for packages I build
> manually. However I didn't, so can I retr
I just recently bothered reading part of pacman's man page and found
that I probably should have performed a `pacman -U --asdeps
mypkg.tar.gz` as I installed dependencies for packages I build
manually. However I didn't, so can I retro-actively change the
reason-for-installation of an already insta
On or about Tuesday 19 May 2009 at approximately 08:14:13 Andrei Thorp
composed:
> Hey,
>
> We see people trying to make an Arch repo mirror to save themselves
> bandwidth. I think that doesn't really make too much sense. Instead,
> it seems much better to implement a download proxy. The way this
20 matches
Mail list logo
