On or about Tuesday 19 May 2009 at approximately 03:33:03 bardo composed:
> 2009/5/18 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. :
> >
> >
> >
>
> I think this may be your problem. I searched some time ago and found
> out PolicyKit didn't support group matche
On or about Tuesday 19 May 2009 at approximately 02:59:02 Jan de Groot
composed:
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 02:51 -0500, David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote:
> > Yes, that is the total 22 byte contents that crashed kmail. And this
> > is a RC
> > release???
>
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14698
>
> I
kdeusers,
If you haven't tried a dark theme for your kde desktop yet, you are
missing
out on some really cool looks. I toyed with dark themes over the years, but
never really found one that worked. After being inspired to try again by
senior Rosenstrauch posted one to the list, I took
Eric Bélanger wrote:
2009/5/19 Sébastien Duquette :
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
Another solution is to have all computers using only one pacman cache
located on a single computer via nfs. So once a computer has
downloaded a packages, all the other ones can g
2009/5/19 Sébastien Duquette :
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>
>> Another solution is to have all computers using only one pacman cache
>> located on a single computer via nfs. So once a computer has
>> downloaded a packages, all the other ones can grab it directly fr
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Another solution is to have all computers using only one pacman cache
> located on a single computer via nfs. So once a computer has
> downloaded a packages, all the other ones can grab it directly from
> the local network.
I might be wron
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote:
>>> (...) When a computer on the network asks for a file
>>> that's been downloaded previously, there is no need to go into the
>>> Internet.
>>
>> Yes and no.
>>
>> arch packages are not exactly small. I run a squid cache and a cache object
>>
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Matthew wrote:
> Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Just for information, there has been already two bug reports in
>> Bugzilla that mention a bug in the display size of textboxes. Until
>> now, only Archers seems to suffer from this bug and one of the mo
Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
Hi List,
Just for information, there has been already two bug reports in
Bugzilla that mention a bug in the display size of textboxes. Until
now, only Archers seems to suffer from this bug and one of the mozilla
developers has marked this issue as specific to Arch. Theref
>> (...) When a computer on the network asks for a file
>> that's been downloaded previously, there is no need to go into the
>> Internet.
>
> Yes and no.
>
> arch packages are not exactly small. I run a squid cache and a cache object
> size of 128KB serves me pretty well. To accomodate all arch pa
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 22:29:05 Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:11, Shridhar Daithankar
>
> wrote:
> > (Yes I read about pkgdd but I need something thats in core/extra as it
> > gives extra confidence in terms of testing.)
>
> You can definitely trust Xyne, he's a great author. Y
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:11, Shridhar Daithankar
wrote:
> (Yes I read about pkgdd but I need something thats in core/extra as it gives
> extra
> confidence in terms of testing.)
>
You can definitely trust Xyne, he's a great author. You really don't
need to be so paranoid. :P
Plus you can just l
It seems to be a problem with Firefox 3.5 beta only. (I can't confirm
it, though)
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote:
> On 2009-05-19 04:50, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Just for information, there has been already two bug reports in
>> Bugzilla that mention a bu
On 2009-05-19 04:50, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
Hi List,
Just for information, there has been already two bug reports in
Bugzilla that mention a bug in the display size of textboxes. Until
now, only Archers seems to suffer from this bug and one of the mozilla
developers has marked this issue as spe
Hello,
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 18:44:13 Andrei Thorp wrote:
> We see people trying to make an Arch repo mirror to save themselves
> bandwidth. I think that doesn't really make too much sense. Instead,
> it seems much better to implement a download proxy. The way this works
> is that all traffic is
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote:
OOOH,
This is much worse than I thought. kword will not even open a text file
without crashing. Where does this bug go? Arch, kdemod or kde?. I seems like
it should go to Arch because there is something wildly incompatible between
the koffice build and kde3.
Hey,
We see people trying to make an Arch repo mirror to save themselves
bandwidth. I think that doesn't really make too much sense. Instead,
it seems much better to implement a download proxy. The way this works
is that all traffic is routed through a computer which backs up stuff
that passes thr
2009/5/18 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. :
>
>
>
I think this may be your problem. I searched some time ago and found
out PolicyKit didn't support group matches. A quick look to the
PolicyKit.conf(5) man page seems to confirm this is still the ca
On or about Tuesday 19 May 2009 at approximately 02:51:09 David C. Rankin,
J.D.,P.E. composed:
>
> OOOH,
>
> This is much worse than I thought. kword will not even open a text file
> without crashing. Where does this bug go? Arch, kdemod or kde?. I seems
> like it should go to Arch because t
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
wrote:
> On or about Tuesday 19 May 2009 at approximately 02:42:40 David C. Rankin,
> J.D.,P.E. composed:
>> Listmates,
>>
>> I installed koffice and attempted to open an openoffice (.odt) document
>> and kword crashed immediately.
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 02:51 -0500, David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote:
> Yes, that is the total 22 byte contents that crashed kmail. And this
> is a RC
> release???
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14698
I think that says all. KOffice 2.0RC isn't a release candidate, and 2.0
isn't a stable usable re
On or about Tuesday 19 May 2009 at approximately 01:31:46 Allan McRae
composed:
snip
>
> You might want to look into this: http://xyne.archlinux.ca/info/pkgd
> >
> >
> >
>
> Pre pacman-3.0 (I think), the architecture was not included in the file
> name. Anything in the [community] repo still wil
On or about Tuesday 19 May 2009 at approximately 02:42:40 David C. Rankin,
J.D.,P.E. composed:
> Listmates,
>
> I installed koffice and attempted to open an openoffice (.odt) document
> and kword crashed immediately. Next I opened kword again to read through
> the help file and any notes, an
Listmates,
I installed koffice and attempted to open an openoffice (.odt) document
and
kword crashed immediately. Next I opened kword again to read through the help
file and any notes, and the help doesn't seem to work either:
http://www.3111skyline.com/download/Archlinux/bugs/koffice.
24 matches
Mail list logo
