Listmates,
I must be blind in one eye and can't see out of the other because I have
picked through every kde control center setting, every domino setting, every
polyester setting and every konqueror setting and I still can't find out how to
turn off the button text underline in kde3 on arc
David C. Rankin wrote:
> Listmates,
>
> One thing I noticed when generating dovecot certs was the significant
> number
> of files in /etc/ssl/certs. What is the reason for/background of Arch's
> gathering of so many cert files, and is there some specific way we should make
> use of them? Ar
Listmates,
I am trying to find the [backspace] key definition so I can change it
to make
the backspace key function as the key for [previous page] in both less and for
man pages. Does any body know where Arch sets this? Thanks.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Och
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
>> Allan McRae schrieb:
>>
>>> Hmmm... I thought about bumping this to 2.6.18 this time round
>>> (based on nothing better that when good kernel headers became
>>> available) but decided not to as 2.6.16 is still widely used given it
On Monday 27 April 2009 01:47:32 Magnus Therning wrote:
> After looking through my new shine Arch system I found that ssh-agent is
> run from /etc/gdm/Xsession, so I suppose that's where I need to make
> changes in order to get gpg-agent to run, right?
Hmm.. I use kde and there is nothing for ssh-
Yeah, it's a funny reality that there is no such thing as "not enough
time" but only priorities.
I guess my main problem is prioritizing lazy activities over more
important, gainful ones. Something to work on.
Cheers,
-AT
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:34 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guilherme M. N
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 09:17:32PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> After looking through my new shine Arch system I found that ssh-agent is
> run from /etc/gdm/Xsession, so I suppose that's where I need to make
> changes in order to get gpg-agent to run, right?
>
> Is there some documentation o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Magnus Therning wrote:
> Hubert Grzeskowiak wrote:
>> Magnus Therning schrieb:
>>> After looking through my new shine Arch system I found that ssh-agent is
>>> run from /etc/gdm/Xsession, so I suppose that's where I need to make
>>> changes in order to
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Allan McRae schrieb:
>> Hmmm... I thought about bumping this to 2.6.18 this time round
>> (based on nothing better that when good kernel headers became
>> available) but decided not to as 2.6.16 is still widely used given it
>> had a backport branch open for a long time (a
Hubert Grzeskowiak wrote:
Magnus Therning schrieb:
After looking through my new shine Arch system I found that ssh-agent is
run from /etc/gdm/Xsession, so I suppose that's where I need to make
changes in order to get gpg-agent to run, right?
Is there some documentation on the preferred way of d
Magnus Therning schrieb:
> After looking through my new shine Arch system I found that ssh-agent is
> run from /etc/gdm/Xsession, so I suppose that's where I need to make
> changes in order to get gpg-agent to run, right?
>
> Is there some documentation on the preferred way of doing this?
>
> Sho
After looking through my new shine Arch system I found that ssh-agent is
run from /etc/gdm/Xsession, so I suppose that's where I need to make
changes in order to get gpg-agent to run, right?
Is there some documentation on the preferred way of doing this?
Should I look into using seahorse inste
JM wrote:
> At the moment, libsoup is the only package on my system depending on
> gconf and orbit2. I'd just prefer to avoid it rather than keep a
> full-featured configuration database system for just one application.
> It's not that much about having a "G" as about keeping it simple.
>
> Regards
Guilherme M. Nogueira wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote:
>> I like this guy :)
>>
>> You've shown yourself to be indeed an awesome community member.
>> Thanks, and I hope that Arch continues to make you happy. And I agree,
>> I always thought Arch would do well for a ser
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:27, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Allan McRae schrieb:
>>>
>>> Hmmm... I thought about bumping this to 2.6.18 this time round (based on
>>> nothing better that when good kernel headers became available) but decided
>>
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> I like this guy :)
>
> You've shown yourself to be indeed an awesome community member.
> Thanks, and I hope that Arch continues to make you happy. And I agree,
> I always thought Arch would do well for a server if you take
> precautions around
Troll? Hmmm No, you are not a troll. (Not that I participate on
these lists all that much myself).
It is interesting though seeing that is someone migrating from
OpenSuse to Arch Linux, as they are almost polar opposites as far as
Linux distros go. I use OpenSuse a lot at work (not my choice),
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:27, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Allan McRae schrieb:
>>
>> Hmmm... I thought about bumping this to 2.6.18 this time round (based on
>> nothing better that when good kernel headers became available) but decided
>> not to as 2.6.16 is still widely used given it had a backpor
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 11:33 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 26. April 2009 11:27:29 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> > I think among the Arch userbase, virtually nobody uses anything older
> > than 2.6.27. We always announce to be "bleeding-edge", so IMO there
> > should be no problem in suppor
"I can look at the license and then see what authority
exists to either substantiate the concerns or provide the information showing
that the concern is unjustified."
Nah, not lawyer speak. Just educated english speak. ;p
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> David C. Rankin wrot
Am Sonntag, 26. April 2009 11:27:29 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> I think among the Arch userbase, virtually nobody uses anything older
> than 2.6.27. We always announce to be "bleeding-edge", so IMO there
> should be no problem in supporting newer kernels only.
So those who use older kernels (why eve
Allan McRae schrieb:
Hmmm... I thought about bumping this to 2.6.18 this time round (based
on nothing better that when good kernel headers became available) but
decided not to as 2.6.16 is still widely used given it had a backport
branch open for a long time (and maybe still does?).
2.6.27
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> +1 that I haven't had trouble with gconf really. At the moment, I
> don't run it and aside from some warnings from some apps, it's
> generally been fine too.
>
> -AT
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-
23 matches
Mail list logo
