Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28.7-2

2009-03-08 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: > - changes for better customizing the default kernel included > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12384 > --> firmware needed to be split off the package. > It is now called kernel26-firmware > - config features

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] fakeroot 1.12.2-1

2009-03-08 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Andreas Radke wrote: > This is a minor update to 1.12.2 - the major change I've done is the > switch to --with-ipc=tcp communication way that should solve some > issues that have come up with recent kde builds. please test if you can > still build all your other stuff with it. > > > Attention: Plea

[arch-general] [signoff] device-mapper-1.02.31-1 & lvm2-2.02.45-1

2009-03-08 Thread Eric Bélanger
Hi, device-mapper-1.02.31-1 and lvm2-2.02.45-1 are now in testing for both arches. It's a minor upstream update. Please signoff. As few devs use this (I think I'm the only one using lvm on i686), signoff from users would be appreciated. Eric

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28.7-2

2009-03-08 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - changes for better customizing the default kernel included http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12384 --> firmware needed to be split off the package. It is now called kernel26-firmware - config features added: http://bugs.archlinux.org/t

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Out-of-date orphans in repo

2009-03-08 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:29 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> >> We should really drop this hwd stuff. Apparently some howtos still >> recommend using "hwd -xa" to generate xorg.conf, but this command >> will >> generate a bloated configuration f

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Out-of-date orphans in repo

2009-03-08 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Eric Bélanger schrieb: >> >> lshwd: >> Package in the repo is at the latest stable (few years old). There's a >> newer rc release but : do we still need this?  It's still popular >> (25.39 %) though  so I could always update it to the rc rel