On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 20:42 -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> I know that Arch Linux don't support these directories as tmpfs or
> "all
> empty" by default, but with these trivial patches to rc-script can
> support it.
> Not only this is usefull for "tmpfs", maybe for other things.
Having ini
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 15:11 -0800, Zack wrote:
> This will likely fix the problem for you. Put this in
> /etc/PolicyKit/PolicyKit.conf and restart hal, /etc/rc.d/hal restart.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Remem
Hello Preston, here you have :)
http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/173.14.09/README/appendix-a.html(173)
http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/180.29/README/appendix-a.html(lastest)
and legacy is for AGP cards...
cyaa
Thanks pyther. The forums do seem to be more active.
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:43:11 -0500, "Preston C."
wrote:
> Thanks Alessandro. Do you know if I should remove libgl for the
> nvidia-utils ?
Yes you should remove libgl for nvidia-utils. From my understanding both
nvidia and ati provide their own libgl libraries, thus the conflict.
BTW you shoul
Thanks Alessandro. Do you know if I should remove libgl for the nvidia-utils ?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:27:41PM -0500, Preston C. wrote:
> > nvidia (kernel module) and nvidia-utils.
> > These are the latest drivers for the newer cards.
> >
>
> While my card was released in the past 3-4 years, it seems, I do not
> know if it would fall under the new category. That is why I
So I tried the command "pacman -S nvidia" and it said that
nvidia-utils conflicts with libgl. Then is asked me if I wanted to
remove libgl? Any help here is appreciated.
> nvidia (kernel module) and nvidia-utils.
> These are the latest drivers for the newer cards.
>
While my card was released in the past 3-4 years, it seems, I do not
know if it would fall under the new category. That is why I am
thinking of going with 173xx driver. Just don't know what to do?
Than
>> I have a GeForce 7600 GS. I do not know which command to run because I
>> do not know which driver to use. Should I use nvidia-96xx or
>> nvidia-173xx or nvidia ? Thanks.
I am thinking it is the 173xx, but wanted to be sure. It does not tell
me exactly in the Beginners Guide or the Nvidia page i
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:38:15PM -0500, Preston C. wrote:
> I have a GeForce 7600 GS. I do not know which command to run because I
> do not know which driver to use. Should I use nvidia-96xx or
> nvidia-173xx or nvidia ? Thanks.
nvidia (kernel module) and nvidia-utils.
These are the latest drive
You could search for which models each driver supports, and try the one(s)
that support yours. Use whichever works best and just uninstal what you
don't use.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Preston C. wrote:
> I have a GeForce 7600 GS. I do not know which command to run because I
> do not know
Andreas Radke wrote:
> New Foomatic 4.0.0 has hit the testing repo. The ppd pkg got dropped, a
> new nonfree package has been added. See the announcement for major
> changes, esp. pdf printing workflow.
>
> http://forums.linux-foundation.org/read.php?21,8139,8139#msg-8139
>
> Please report if you c
Hello,
Thanks, but, as I said, I had followed the instructions on the Wiki,
which were exactly what you sent. It still does not work. Is there
anything else that might be causing the issue?
--
Leonid
I have a GeForce 7600 GS. I do not know which command to run because I
do not know which driver to use. Should I use nvidia-96xx or
nvidia-173xx or nvidia ? Thanks.
RedShift wrote:
> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>> Hi people!
>>
>> I interested to make Arch Linux suitable for use with a /var/run and
>> /var/lock that are mounted as tmpfs. But this also helps, in the case
>> that not mounted as tmpfs, to make more simple "purge function" for
>> these directori
This will likely fix the problem for you. Put this in
/etc/PolicyKit/PolicyKit.conf and restart hal, /etc/rc.d/hal restart.
A search through the forums will find similar posts.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:01
Hello,
I just upgraded to networkmanager 0.7, which comes with a hal upgrade.
Following this new upgrade, I am unable to mount devices from Dolphin
as I used to be able to -- it now gives me a "PermissionDeniedByPolicy
mount-removable-extra-options no" error. I followed the instructions
on [1] but
Jan Spakula wrote:
> Excerpts from Jan Spakula's message of Thu Feb 12 09:22:00 +0100 2009:
>
>> Excerpts from Jan de Groot's message of Thu Feb 12 08:59:41 +0100 2009:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 05:51 -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>>>
I interested to make Arch Linux su
Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 05:51 -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>
>> Hi people!
>>
>> I interested to make Arch Linux suitable for use with a /var/run and
>> /var/lock that are mounted as tmpfs. But this also helps, in the case
>> that not mounted as tmpfs, to make more si
On (10/02/09 08:56) Rumen Yotov wrote:
> On (05/02/09 20:10) Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:54:17 +0200
> > Румен wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > Dieter Plaetinck написа:
> > > > On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:02:53 +0200
> > > > Rumen Yotov wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> I interested to make Arch Linux suitable for use with a /var/run and
> /var/lock that are mounted as tmpfs. But this also helps, in the case
> that not mounted as tmpfs, to make more simple "purge function" for
> these directories at rc.sysinit step.
This could also help to run the root filesyst
I also have these as tmpfs:
/var/cache/songbird
/var/cache/firefox
/var/lock
/var/log
/var/run
/var/tmp
/tmp
I created a simple daemon to sync the files. I don't need patching: just add
it to the daemon array. I don't care about all except for logs. Here is the
small daemon:
#!/bin/bash
now=`date
Excerpts from Jan Spakula's message of Thu Feb 12 09:22:00 +0100 2009:
> Excerpts from Jan de Groot's message of Thu Feb 12 08:59:41 +0100 2009:
> > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 05:51 -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> > > I interested to make Arch Linux suitable for use with a /var/run and
> > > /var
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Hi people!
I interested to make Arch Linux suitable for use with a /var/run and
/var/lock that are mounted as tmpfs. But this also helps, in the case
that not mounted as tmpfs, to make more simple "purge function" for
these directories at rc.sysinit step.
In my cas
Excerpts from Jan de Groot's message of Thu Feb 12 08:59:41 +0100 2009:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 05:51 -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> > I interested to make Arch Linux suitable for use with a /var/run and
> > /var/lock that are mounted as tmpfs. But this also helps, in the case
> > that not
26 matches
Mail list logo
