[arch-general] consistency in iso naming

Hi, I suggest we use the following names: 2009.01-alpha 2009.01-beta 2009.01-1 (official release) (2009.01-2, 2009.01-3 etc subsequent official releases, if required) I think our isos/img's should have such versions in there filenames, instead of using 2009.01 for alpha + beta + official release

Re: [arch-general] silent fsck at startup

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Markus Heuser wrote: > Hey Denis, > >> There is no information of bugreport or feature request about it, so >> should it be sane to open a feature request to remove this behaviour? > > Well, that depends on whether the devs think it's "working as intended". > Perso

Re: [arch-general] KDE 4.2.0 in [testing]

2009/1/23 Pierre Schmitz : > Packages for x86_64 should be available on your favourite mirror soon; Andrea > will build i66 packages tomorrow. Sorry for the delay, I'm uploading all packages for i686 now. -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer