Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Dan Vratil wrote:
Also, could please someone confirm me, that KDE 4.1 freezes when updating?
After some package was updated, Plasma went frozen and I had to shutdown the X
server and finnish the update from console.
This could be serious.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 07:35:45PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Best I can do after some initial hacking. Are there any assumptions we
> can make based on package name to trim the list so we don't have to
> check all PKGBUILDs?
>
> This is done without a checkout of the full repo, using svn list
On Friday 23 January 2009 02:04:34 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Freitag 23 Januar 2009 01:19:26 schrieb Dan Vratil:
> > Some of my old desktop settings (wallpaper, size of icons etc) were
> > replace by KDE 4.2 default settings. But it's probably only about Plasma
> > config, because Kopete, KMail an
On Friday 23 January 2009 01:53:26 Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Dan Vratil wrote:
> > Also, could please someone confirm me, that KDE 4.1 freezes when
> > updating? After some package was updated, Plasma went frozen and I had to
> > shutdown the X server and finnish the
Am Freitag 23 Januar 2009 01:19:26 schrieb Dan Vratil:
> Some of my old desktop settings (wallpaper, size of icons etc) were replace
> by KDE 4.2 default settings. But it's probably only about Plasma config,
> because Kopete, KMail and all other applications kept their settings.
Didn't you change
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Dan Vratil wrote:
Also, could please someone confirm me, that KDE 4.1 freezes when updating?
After some package was updated, Plasma went frozen and I had to shutdown the X
server and finnish the update from console.
This could be s
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Dan Vratil wrote:
> Also, could please someone confirm me, that KDE 4.1 freezes when updating?
> After some package was updated, Plasma went frozen and I had to shutdown the X
> server and finnish the update from console.
This could be serious. If, for some reason
Hello Pierre,
I just updated KDE 4.2 (x86_64) and I'm amazed. It all seems faster and
smoother to me, some new features are really great. Here are some problems
(really, nothing serious) I already found:
Some of my old desktop settings (wallpaper, size of icons etc) were replace by
KDE 4.2 defa
Hi everybody,
today I uploaded the so called "first try" of 4.2 into [testing]. Those
packages are not the final one yet, but damn close. There are only two known
upstream showstoppers; which will be fixed by new packages soon. See
http://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?keywords=kde-4.2.0-blocker.
O
stop spamming the list and my inbox:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD
thnaks
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Amanai wrote:
>>
>> I gotta say, even with all the usual MS distrust that I've been
>> carrying around since MS-DOS 3.x, on the surface Moonlight looks much
>> more promising than the clusterfsck that is Flash. I'd be interested
>> in at least giving it a shot.
>>
Amani, your posts to this list are now moderated. I will review them
all for insults before approving them. Try to be civil, please,
especially when you're asking other people to do work for you.
Back on topic:
One user talking on an ML does not make a package important. I have
not yet run into a
stefan-husm...@t-online.de schrieb:
I agree perfectly. But it would be the correct way to handle things
like that, and would put some noise away from this list.
BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to
community without discussion. The devs might have some similar rules f
Amanai schrieb:
I pick this up. I don't want to build it and upload moonlight for AUR. I
don't want to use any packages from AUR.
Then pay someone to do it. Seriously, what kind of attitude is that?
I'm not generally against using moonlight, but the usual way for a
package inside Arch is thro
-Original Message-
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:09:44 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
> From: Amanai
> To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux"
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:40 -0800, stefan-husm...@t-online.de
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I agree perfectly. But it w
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:40 -0800, stefan-husm...@t-online.de
wrote:
Hello,
I agree perfectly. But it would be the correct way to handle things
like that, and would put some noise away from this list.
BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to
community without discussi
-Original Message-
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:05:47 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
> From: Allan McRae
> To: General Discusson about Arch Linux
> stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +0100
> > > S
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>
>>>
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +0100
>>> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
>>> From: Amanai
>>> To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux"
>>>On Thu, 22
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Amanai wrote:
> The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this be
> avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
>
> http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
>
> Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for Unix
> systems. I
Xavier 写道:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Lyman wrote:
Hi,
I found that the package intltool does not contain the file doc/I18N-HOWTO,
which is contained in official release.
As this file is supposed to be found locally easily, once it is missing even
google can not give out useful hint ef
Amanai,
The question: do you use any packages from community repo?
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Amanai wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not just installing the xpi-file for Firefox directly from the mono
>> project? It works really great. Ok, it's not compiled from source, but
>> it's available for i586 a
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Lyman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that the package intltool does not contain the file doc/I18N-HOWTO,
> which is contained in official release.
>
> As this file is supposed to be found locally easily, once it is missing even
> google can not give out useful hint effi
Why not just installing the xpi-file for Firefox directly from the mono
project? It works really great. Ok, it's not compiled from source, but
it's available for i586 and x86_64.
See here: http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Daniel
I am using Opera! Moonlight works really great with Opera t
stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
-Original Message-
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +0100
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
From: Amanai
To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux"
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn
wrote:
On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Am
On Thu, January 22, 2009 12:28 pm, Amanai wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn
> wrote:
>
>> On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote:
>>
>>> The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will
>>> this
>>> be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
>>
>> Currently
-Original Message-
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
> From: Amanai
> To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux"
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn
> wrote:
>
> > On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote:
> >
> > > The fina
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn wrote:
On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote:
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this
be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
Currently the SVN version of Moonlight is available via AUR, the package
is called
On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote:
> The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this
> be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
Currently the SVN version of Moonlight is available via AUR, the package
is called "moon-svn."
Thomas
Hi,
I found that the package intltool does not contain the file
doc/I18N-HOWTO, which is contained in official release.
As this file is supposed to be found locally easily, once it is missing
even google can not give out useful hint efficiently.
IMHO, this file is vital for the person who i
Amanai wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:57:26 -0800, RedShift wrote:
Amanai wrote:
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will
this be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silve
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:57:26 -0800, RedShift wrote:
Amanai wrote:
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will
this be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight
for U
Amanai wrote:
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this
be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for
Unix systems. It's avaible for 32/64 bit!
Release Notes
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this
be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for
Unix systems. It's avaible for 32/64 bit!
Release Notes
Final release
33 matches
Mail list logo
