Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28-2

2009-01-07 Thread pyther
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:00:08 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 16:54 -0500, pyther wrote: >> I just wanted to let the devs know that 2.4.x causes Xorg to crash >> with >> Kernel 2.6.28, so some users might have issues. It doesn't matter to >> me >> either way just wanted to let t

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28-2

2009-01-07 Thread Jan de Groot
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 16:54 -0500, pyther wrote: > I just wanted to let the devs know that 2.4.x causes Xorg to crash > with > Kernel 2.6.28, so some users might have issues. It doesn't matter to > me > either way just wanted to let that information be known. No problems here, 945GM G33 Q35 All

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28-2

2009-01-07 Thread pyther
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:37:33 +0100, tob...@justdreams.de wrote: > Quoting Jan de Groot : >> I'm running the 2.6 prerelease series for a while on my laptop now. My >> first impressions: >> - EXA is even slower than it was with 2.4.3 >> - UXA is much faster >> - XAA not tested >> - 3D is horribly sl

Re: [arch-general] How to resolve dependency issue - bluez-libs

2009-01-07 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:13 PM, richard terry wrote: > This sort of thing always used to be uncommon in Arch. > > However: Tried to upgrade recently as I do every fe days, got this: > > looking for inter-conflicts... > :: bluez-libs conflicts with bluez. Remove bluez? [Y/n] n > error: unresolvabl

Re: [arch-general] xscreensaver broken?

2009-01-07 Thread Guus Snijders
2009/1/7 Gerhard Brauer : > Am Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:40:00 +0100 > schrieb "Guus Snijders" : > >> But later on i noticed some problems with other >> apps, so i think it's a problem with my current installation. I'll try >> a reinstall later this week. > > Have you checked if you use some no-default op

Re: [arch-general] xscreensaver broken?

2009-01-07 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Am Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:40:00 +0100 schrieb "Guus Snijders" : > But later on i noticed some problems with other > apps, so i think it's a problem with my current installation. I'll try > a reinstall later this week. Have you checked if you use some no-default optimizations in makepkg.conf? Or if it

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] WICD, up for grabs

2009-01-07 Thread Vesa Kaihlavirta
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:35:14AM +0200, Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote: >> >> I talked with Angel on IRC and we decided to work on wicd together and >> keep it in extra for now. Angel, do you concur? >> >> And there's a brand new wicd-1.5.8-1 f