I am presently building all the packages in abs/core against the latest abs
kernel, glibc and gcc versions.
I think as a goal that the core and extra repositories should be able to build
against the latest tools/kernel (in the repos).
There has been some failures to build for various reasons.
Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things:
just a quick rebuild fixing karma support and bumped depend on mkinitcpio
0.5.20.
please signoff for both arches
I would like to move in kernel, klibc, mkinitcpio,module-init-tools and binary
modules on tuesday to core if you are all fine with
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:50:23PM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>> > PS, another hug to Sergej for rebuilding ALL of his packages :)
>> >
>> Correction, turns out Sergej didnt rebuild all his packages. Just some
>> of them were built by other
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:50:23PM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> > PS, another hug to Sergej for rebuilding ALL of his packages :)
> >
> Correction, turns out Sergej didnt rebuild all his packages. Just some
> of them were built by other people.
>
> Libpcap rebuild results: approximately 6 p
> PS, another hug to Sergej for rebuilding ALL of his packages :)
>
Correction, turns out Sergej didnt rebuild all his packages. Just some
of them were built by other people.
Libpcap rebuild results: approximately 6 packages have been rebuilt,
while 5 havent.
Greg
pgpaQPkO2wQ2X.pgp
Description
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:04:03PM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> >>
> >> This thread is started by Eduardo 'kensai' who told that WICD is up
> >> for grabs, he wrote
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote:
>>
>> This thread is started by Eduardo 'kensai' who told that WICD is up
>> for grabs, he wrote that in arch-dev-public, and since no-dev seemed
>> interested, I replied i
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote:
>
> This thread is started by Eduardo 'kensai' who told that WICD is up
> for grabs, he wrote that in arch-dev-public, and since no-dev seemed
> interested, I replied in this list, is that a crime?.
>
No, but you replied to a discuss
>
> IMO it should stay in extra. Its the only decent alternative to netcfg
> if you dont want to use GNOME or KDE.
In my opinion should be in extra too, but if remains in extra and
nobody grab it, it will get more out-of-date.
> And plus its not that out of date, just a sub-version behind.
Probab
9 matches
Mail list logo
