Re: [arch-general] Dovecot imap processes pinning CPU

2008-12-13 Thread Paul Ezvan
Le Saturday 13 December 2008 18:55:14 David Rosenstrauch, vous avez écrit : > Paul Ezvan wrote: > > Are you running thunderbird on the same machine which runs dovecot ? I > > tried to reproduce the bug whith my remote server using dovecot. But when > > I close thunderbird, the problem occurs on my

Re: [arch-general] Dovecot imap processes pinning CPU

2008-12-13 Thread David Rosenstrauch
Paul Ezvan wrote: Are you running thunderbird on the same machine which runs dovecot ? I tried to reproduce the bug whith my remote server using dovecot. But when I close thunderbird, the problem occurs on my local machine (kaddressbook takes 100% of the cpu and is not killed by kill -9), and e

Re: [arch-general] pysol/python broken?

2008-12-13 Thread Javier Vasquez
On 12/1/08, Javier Vasquez wrote: > On 11/30/08, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: >> >> -Original Message- >>> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:30:09 +0100 >>> Subject: [arch-general] pysol/python broken? >>> From: "Javier Vasquez" >>> To: arch-general@archlinux.org >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm

Re: [arch-general] Dovecot imap processes pinning CPU

2008-12-13 Thread Paul Ezvan
Le Saturday 13 December 2008 15:58:16 David Rosenstrauch, vous avez écrit : > Andreas Radke wrote: > > looks ok here using 2 claws-mail clients. maybe it's indeed Thunderbird. > > Not sure what's going on, but apparently I'm not the only person seeing > this. A bunch of other people have seen the

Re: [arch-general] bug in pacman? or something else?

2008-12-13 Thread Hubert Grzeskowiak
> Is this dejavu? I think i deleted the same conversation from my inbox > yesterday.. > > Greg > rather a dejavu ;-)

Re: [arch-general] bug in pacman? or something else?

2008-12-13 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Sentinel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is this a bug, or pacman can not correctly figure out the version of >> heimdal? Or maybe I am missing something...? >> >> I installed wireshark but with a workaround. I edited the

Re: [arch-general] bug in pacman? or something else?

2008-12-13 Thread Sentinel
Dan McGee wrote: On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Sentinel wrote: Hello, Is this a bug, or pacman can not correctly figure out the version of heimdal? Or maybe I am missing something...? I installed wireshark but with a workaround. I edited the PKGBUILD end deleted the heimdal dependency.

Re: [arch-general] bug in pacman? or something else?

2008-12-13 Thread Dan McGee
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Sentinel wrote: > Hello, > > Is this a bug, or pacman can not correctly figure out the version of > heimdal? Or maybe I am missing something...? > > I installed wireshark but with a workaround. I edited the PKGBUILD end > deleted the heimdal dependency. As I have t

Re: [arch-general] bug in pacman? or something else?

2008-12-13 Thread Allan McRae
Sentinel wrote: Hello, Is this a bug, or pacman can not correctly figure out the version of heimdal? Or maybe I am missing something...? I installed wireshark but with a workaround. I edited the PKGBUILD end deleted the heimdal dependency. As I have the correct version of heimdal installed

[arch-general] bug in pacman? or something else?

2008-12-13 Thread Sentinel
Hello, Is this a bug, or pacman can not correctly figure out the version of heimdal? Or maybe I am missing something...? I installed wireshark but with a workaround. I edited the PKGBUILD end deleted the heimdal dependency. As I have the correct version of heimdal installed it was built succ

Re: [arch-general] Dovecot imap processes pinning CPU

2008-12-13 Thread David Rosenstrauch
Andreas Radke wrote: looks ok here using 2 claws-mail clients. maybe it's indeed Thunderbird. Not sure what's going on, but apparently I'm not the only person seeing this. A bunch of other people have seen the same thing. The dovecot guys are speculating that it's something in the kernel.

Re: [arch-general] Dovecot imap processes pinning CPU

2008-12-13 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:34:56 -0500 schrieb David Rosenstrauch : > > > David Rosenstrauch wrote: > > In recent days, dovecot's "imap" processes keep getting stuck. > > Each time I check my server there's a bunch of "imap" processes > > (sometimes 2 of them, sometimes 4, sometimes 6) that are usin

Re: [arch-general] Dovecot imap processes pinning CPU

2008-12-13 Thread RedShift
Hello David Rosenstrauch wrote: In recent days, dovecot's "imap" processes keep getting stuck. Each time I check my server there's a bunch of "imap" processes (sometimes 2 of them, sometimes 4, sometimes 6) that are using all of the box's CPU. And worse, there's no way to kill the processes ei