On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Ryan Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> PS. I've also been exploring automounting with udev, but I run into
> the same permissions problem with pmount: users can't access the file.
> I would also welcome advice in this direction, if anyone's
> interested.
Have you
I'm working on switching from KDE to openbox, and I'm playing around
with ivman automounting. After reading the wiki page[1] & following
the instructions, I find that I still can't get USB devices to
automount as a user. I can run ivman as a daemon, and it automounts
just fine, except that it cre
>> As you might now, the bluetooth packages in Arch are not activelly
>> maintained so the main developers were looking for help.
>> I've expressed my readiness to help in any way I can, but I'd also
>> like suggestions and help from other people here.
>
> Just an FYI - we're bringing on a maintain
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Damjan Georgievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you might now, the bluetooth packages in Arch are not activelly
> maintained so the main developers were looking for help.
> I've expressed my readiness to help in any way I can, but I'd also
> like suggestions and h
As you might now, the bluetooth packages in Arch are not activelly
maintained so the main developers were looking for help.
I've expressed my readiness to help in any way I can, but I'd also
like suggestions and help from other people here.
So, I've created a git repository for bluetooth related P
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Baho Utot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 December 2008 8:45:13 pm Daenyth Blank wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 20:33, Baho Utot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > OpenSp PKGBUILD fails to compile with the following error:
>> >
>> > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 8:45:13 pm Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 20:33, Baho Utot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OpenSp PKGBUILD fails to compile with the following error:
> >
> > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../generic -march=native
> > -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame
On Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2008 01:14 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> If you put it this way there probably never was a reason for hwd.
> But hwd doesnt only produce xorg configuration files.
> It lists the appropriate kernel modules for your hardware in a very
> user friendly
> way. I guess lshwd did t
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Amanai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:45:56 -0800, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> What's the rush?
>>>
>>
>> Please change then the Archlinux Wiki "
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Amanai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:45:56 -0800, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> What's the rush?
>>
>
> Please change then the Archlinux Wiki "Xorg"
>
> If someone follow the configure with HWD he run's in trouble. I think HWD
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:45:56 -0800, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What's the rush?
Please change then the Archlinux Wiki "Xorg"
If someone follow the configure with HWD he run's in trouble. I think HWD
in AUR for some reason what ever is good enough. I used HWD for quick
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Daenyth Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:35, timetrap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> KISS dictates that we abandon abstraction tools as much as possible.
>>> Es
Hmm I like that idea. I honestly have not used hwd for anything but
configuring X.
Maybe add a line that says: 'hwd -x is no longer supported please use
`X -configure`'
Or would that be unArchful?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Daenyth Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Daenyth Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:35, timetrap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> KISS dictates that we abandon abstraction tools as much as possible.
>> Especially those tools that duplicate functionality.
> IMO, the most KISS thing to
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Alessandro Doro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:38:37PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> Finally fixed this little bugger. As far as I know, nothing was lost,
>> it just wasn't generating html pages for the mails.
>>
>
> Not really fixed.
>
> Se
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:35, timetrap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> KISS dictates that we abandon abstraction tools as much as possible.
> Especially those tools that duplicate functionality.
IMO, the most KISS thing to do with it is keep it, but in the next
release, remove the -x function entirely
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:38:37PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Finally fixed this little bugger. As far as I know, nothing was lost,
> it just wasn't generating html pages for the mails.
>
Not really fixed.
See, e.g., http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-December/
Only the last
KISS dictates that we abandon abstraction tools as much as possible.
Especially those tools that duplicate functionality.
hwd should not be maintained any longer than its usefulness dictates.
If you REALLY like this version of hwd, AUR would be a good place to keep it.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:
On 12/3/08, Guus Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/12/3 Javier Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [ problem switching from X to console ]
>
>
>> It took me a while, but I finally figured things up. I don't
>> understand why I never needed this stuff before, but actually now I
>> got [EMAIL
Pierre Chapuis wrote:
Le Wed, 3 Dec 2008 01:10:34 +0100,
Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Well, it does not produce working xorg.conf files. However: X -configure
should be prefered; so there is no need for hwd (anymore).
It doesn't provide working xorg.conf files only since xorg
2008/12/3 Javier Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[ problem switching from X to console ]
> It took me a while, but I finally figured things up. I don't
> understand why I never needed this stuff before, but actually now I
> got [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my console with terminus font v20b, looking nice,
21 matches
Mail list logo
