Re: [arch-general] pacman -- force removal despite dependencies (libgl)

2008-10-23 Thread Jan de Groot
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 01:34 +0100, Stephen Wilkinson wrote: > Hello All, > > I have both xf86-video-vesa and nvidia-96xx installed, but I have > issues with the proprietary drivers, so I wanted to try out vesa with > libgl. > > I can remove nvidia-96xx, but trying to remove nvidia-96xx-utils flag

Re: [arch-general] pacman -- force removal despite dependencies (libgl)

2008-10-23 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Stephen Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > > I have both xf86-video-vesa and nvidia-96xx installed, but I have > issues with the proprietary drivers, so I wanted to try out vesa with > libgl. > > I can remove nvidia-96xx, but trying to remove nvidia

Re: [arch-general] pacman -- force removal despite dependencies (libgl)

2008-10-23 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Stephen Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > > I have both xf86-video-vesa and nvidia-96xx installed, but I have > issues with the proprietary drivers, so I wanted to try out vesa with > libgl. > > I can remove nvidia-96xx, but trying to remove nvidia

[arch-general] pacman -- force removal despite dependencies (libgl)

2008-10-23 Thread Stephen Wilkinson
Hello All, I have both xf86-video-vesa and nvidia-96xx installed, but I have issues with the proprietary drivers, so I wanted to try out vesa with libgl. I can remove nvidia-96xx, but trying to remove nvidia-96xx-utils flags lots of conflicts. I was going to use pacman -Rc but that would mean uni

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Louis Brazeau
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Interesting. Can you install anything else BEFORE xorg-twm? > I just installed tzdata-2008h-1. No problem. > How about checking your *local* DB with the command Nathan provided: > find /var/lib/pacman/local -name desc -

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Louis Brazeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From this, either "xorg-twm" or "inputproto" would be next in the >> targets list, meaning pacman might be failing on one of those... >> >> -Dan >> >

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Louis Brazeau
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From this, either "xorg-twm" or "inputproto" would be next in the > targets list, meaning pacman might be failing on one of those... > > -Dan > Ok, got it! It's "xorg-twm" that is causing the problem : # pacman -Sp xorg-twm r

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Raeven K.Bathory
maybe you can try `pacman -Syyup --debug` `p' to print out the uris but not download or install anything i can't test it since i'm fully updated, but you could also try the `w' to just download the pkgs instead of `p' i couldn't see anything in the pacman -h about doing that so i guess we could ju

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Louis Brazeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Raeven K.Bathory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> what happens if you remove the possibly corrupted cached file >> /var/cache/pacman/pkg/xextproto-7.0.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz >> > > The line : >

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Louis Brazeau
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Raeven K.Bathory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what happens if you remove the possibly corrupted cached file > /var/cache/pacman/pkg/xextproto-7.0.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz > The line : debug: setting download size 0 for pkg xextproto changes to : debug: setting

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Raeven K.Bathory
what happens if you remove the possibly corrupted cached file /var/cache/pacman/pkg/xextproto-7.0.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Louis Brazeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Can you run with --d

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Louis Brazeau
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Louis Brazeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Can you run with --debug and show us the output? >>> >> >> Aaron Grif

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Louis Brazeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Can you run with --debug and show us the output? >> > > Aaron Griffin is trying to help me with my problem! I feel blessed :) > > The output of

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Louis Brazeau
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you run with --debug and show us the output? > Aaron Griffin is trying to help me with my problem! I feel blessed :) The output of --debug is quite long so I thought I'd better put it on pastebin. Here's the link :

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Louis Brazeau
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Daenyth Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try using pacman -Syyu > Same error unfortunatly : # pacman -Syyu :: Synchronizing package databases... core 31.4K 90.0K/s 00:00:00 []

[arch-general] Colin Pitrat is out of the office.

2008-10-23 Thread Colin Pitrat
I will be out of the office starting 23/10/2008 and will not return until 28/10/2008. I will respond to your message when I return.

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Daenyth Blank
Try using pacman -Syyu

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Louis Brazeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:03 AM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Louis Brazeau wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have a problem upgrading my x86_64 system. It started a couple of >>> days ago when my pac

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Louis Brazeau
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:03 AM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Louis Brazeau wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have a problem upgrading my x86_64 system. It started a couple of >> days ago when my pacman -Syu reported that libxml2 could not be >> fetched. I decided to wait a while and

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] archweb port essentially complete, please test

2008-10-23 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Pierre Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just wanted to point the fact that archlinuxfr.org, where I was an > admin, won't be updated anymore (source : > http://forums.archlinuxfr.org/viewtopic.php?id=1818) This page seems to be written in some sort of crazy l

Re: [arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread David Rosenstrauch
Louis Brazeau wrote: Hi all, I have a problem upgrading my x86_64 system. It started a couple of days ago when my pacman -Syu reported that libxml2 could not be fetched. I decided to wait a while and try again. Then I tried to install gtk2 and got the same error. What should I do ? Which

[arch-general] System upgrade problems

2008-10-23 Thread Louis Brazeau
Hi all, I have a problem upgrading my x86_64 system. It started a couple of days ago when my pacman -Syu reported that libxml2 could not be fetched. I decided to wait a while and try again. This morning I tryed again and when asked to replace gail with extra/gtk2 I accepted. Then I got an error m

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] archweb port essentially complete, please test

2008-10-23 Thread bardo
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Dusty Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Public Arch Linux site: >http://pub.playground.archlinux.ca/ I just gave a quick look around: - When browsing the repos I see two buttons (I think) I shouldn't see: adopt and disown. Disown doesn't do anything, adopt

Re: [arch-general] After installation of dbus-1.2.3-3: error while loading shared libraries: libdbus-1.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

2008-10-23 Thread Paul Ezvan
Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Am Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:13:09 +0200 schrieb "Michael Schmarck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello. 2008/10/21 Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Let me guess, dbus-core was not pulled in because you installed > things with the -d flag? No. I ran "pacman -S

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] archweb port essentially complete, please test

2008-10-23 Thread Pierre Chapuis
Le Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:06:00 -0400, "Dusty Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hey all, > > I've finished my first iteration of porting the archweb_pub and > archweb_dev sites to django-1.0, along with a substantial rewrite of > several portions of the code, as I mentioned in a previous sta