Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up the base group

2008-08-29 Thread Alessio Bolognino
On Fri 2008-08-29 23:42, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Freitag 29 August 2008 12:27:50 schrieb Thomas Bächler: > > - nano Do we really need another editor in base? Let's leave it in > > core, remove it from base. > > This might end up in a flamwar, but if we have to remove one editor I > would vote v

Re: [arch-general] Integrity Check

2008-08-29 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2008/8/29 Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Missing Makedepends >> - >> xosd --> 'xmms' >> flac --> 'xmms' >> >> Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends >> >> core/iputils depends on ext

Re: [arch-general] Integrity Check

2008-08-29 Thread bardo
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Packages in extra shouldn't makedepends or depends on packages from > community. Xmms is an exception. The person who initially moved it to > community didn't checked if it was required by other packages in extra. As I > ma

Re: [arch-general] Integrity Check

2008-08-29 Thread Eric Belanger
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, bardo wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just read one comment from Thomas : http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6841#comment32155 Is it fine for core package to have makedepends in extra? What about extra and community (the xmms makedep

Re: [arch-general] Integrity Check

2008-08-29 Thread bardo
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just read one comment from Thomas : > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6841#comment32155 > > Is it fine for core package to have makedepends in extra? > What about extra and community (the xmms makedepends above)? > The second wou

Re: [arch-general] Integrity Check

2008-08-29 Thread Xavier
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Missing Makedepends > - > xosd --> 'xmms' > flac --> 'xmms' > > Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends > > core/iputils depends on extra/jade > core/madwifi-utils depends on extra/sha

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up the base group

2008-08-29 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Arvid Ephraim Picciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 29 August 2008 14:17:06 RedShift wrote: > >> > - ppp, rp-pppoe (plus libpcap dep) >> > Only few people need those, leave them in core, but remove from base > > just remember to keep them on the minimal li

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up the base group

2008-08-29 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
On Friday 29 August 2008 14:17:06 RedShift wrote: > > - ppp, rp-pppoe (plus libpcap dep) > > Only few people need those, leave them in core, but remove from base just remember to keep them on the minimal live cd ;) -- best regards Arvid Ephraim Picciani

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up the base group

2008-08-29 Thread RedShift
Thomas Bächler wrote: Now that our installer installs the whole base group by default, I'd wish it would stick to the essential part. I suggest cleaning this up a bit: Packages that IMO shouldn't be in base: - dialog Nothing depends on it, why do we even need it in core? - hwdetect Nothing us