Re: [arch-general] Problems with snort package

2008-07-03 Thread Kessia 'even' Pinheiro
Sorry, i forgot add a issue [1] in bugtracker. . . Someone add this bug, but solves with a patch. I do a new package. =) [1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10775?string=snort&project=0&search_name=&type[0]=&sev[0]=&pri[0]=&due[0]=&reported[0]=&cat[0]=&status[0]=open&percent[0]=&opened=&dev=&close

Re: [arch-general] Problems with snort package

2008-07-03 Thread Angel Velásquez
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > Hi Kessia! our beloved brazilian hacker girl. > I did a snort instalation using the package from extra, but i got some > problems. The package does not works after a fresh install. The > problems

[arch-general] Problems with snort package

2008-07-03 Thread Kessia 'even' Pinheiro
Hi everyone, I did a snort instalation using the package from extra, but i got some problems. The package does not works after a fresh install. The problems are: - There are some problematic links with /usr/src/lib/snort_* - The conf /etc/snort/snort.conf doesn't load the rules, because the rules

Re: [arch-general] /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/resolc.conf.tail

2008-07-03 Thread Jan de Groot
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:58 -0400, timetrap wrote: > dhcpcd is fine. But this is a patch for dhclient. Which is a totally > different dhcp client. > > When I installed wicd, dhclient was a dependency, if you want to use > wicd, you need to use dhclient. If you want to have multiple search > domai

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.25.10

2008-07-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
RedShift schrieb: Thomas Bächler wrote: Just a bump to .10 and a minor configuration change (AOE added). It is built with gcc 4.3.1, so if any binary modules break, please tell me. It may be smart to wait for GCC 4.3.2 to come out, because of this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.25.10

2008-07-03 Thread RedShift
Thomas Bächler wrote: Just a bump to .10 and a minor configuration change (AOE added). It is built with gcc 4.3.1, so if any binary modules break, please tell me. It may be smart to wait for GCC 4.3.2 to come out, because of this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451068 Glenn

Re: [arch-general] /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/resolc.conf.tail

2008-07-03 Thread timetrap
I'll give it a shot. Thanks. On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:08 PM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > timetrap wrote: > >> dhcpcd is fine. But this is a patch for dhclient. Which is a totally >> different dhcp client. >> >> When I installed wicd, dhclient was a dependency, if you want to use wicd, >

Re: [arch-general] /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/resolc.conf.tail

2008-07-03 Thread RedShift
timetrap wrote: dhcpcd is fine. But this is a patch for dhclient. Which is a totally different dhcp client. When I installed wicd, dhclient was a dependency, if you want to use wicd, you need to use dhclient. If you want to have multiple search domains with dhclient (through wicd), you need t

Re: [arch-general] /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/resolc.conf.tail

2008-07-03 Thread timetrap
dhcpcd is fine. But this is a patch for dhclient. Which is a totally different dhcp client. When I installed wicd, dhclient was a dependency, if you want to use wicd, you need to use dhclient. If you want to have multiple search domains with dhclient (through wicd), you need to edit your /etc/reso

Re: [arch-general] /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/resolc.conf.tail

2008-07-03 Thread RedShift
timetrap wrote: Hi, this is my first message to arch-general. I have been helping a user on the forums who needs multiple search domains in his /etc/resolv.conf file. His original question was this: "Our DHCP isolates clients to a separate subnet than the servers. As such, unless you fully

Re: [arch-general] community/mc-utf8 to extra/mc

2008-07-03 Thread Jaroslav Lichtblau
> The same in pt_BR.utf8 (brazilian portuguese). > > Armando cs_CZ.UTF8 (Czech) also affected Dragonlord

Re: [arch-general] kernel vga setting problems

2008-07-03 Thread anka
Ralph Alvy wrote On 23-06-2008 08:01: Why is it that after the last few upgrades with pacman I can't use any 'vga=nnn' setting anymore in my grub menu.lst? I used to use 'vga=792' 'vga=795', if memory serves me here. I keep ending up with a message at boot time that tells me the video mode select