On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:54 AM, metin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ?
It's just an inherent bit of suckyness with networkmanager. You can
try filing a bug with them, but don't expect much response. Or give
the 0.7 SVN a go.
James
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:09 AM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why does this package mess around in /usr/local? IIRC there are no Arch
packages that use /usr/local and it's meant for local deviations, so
wouldn't it be wise not to touch /usr/local?
http://www.pathnam
On Thursday 19 June 2008 21:48, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:39 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry
> >>
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Is there some file that I need to edit, in ord
?
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there some file that I need to edit, in order to use gdm as the
display
manager?
Nigel.
You need to edit /etc/inittab
Not saying you're wrong, but personally I've nev
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:39 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there some file that I need to edit, in order to use gdm as the
>>> display
>>> manager?
>>>
>>> Nigel.
>
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there some file that I need to edit, in order to use gdm as the display
manager?
Nigel.
You need to edit /etc/inittab
Not saying you're wrong, but personally I've never edited the inittab
file,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already have one instance of Archlinux installed that has xorg, and KDE
> installed, and from looking at /var/cache/pacman/pkg, I also have gdm
> installed. Now this instance of Archlinux works fine, and I can login to KDE
I already have one instance of Archlinux installed that has xorg, and KDE
installed, and from looking at /var/cache/pacman/pkg, I also have gdm
installed. Now this instance of Archlinux works fine, and I can login to KDE
with no problems. The graphics driver is trident, and according
to /etc/X1
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:09 AM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does this package mess around in /usr/local? IIRC there are no Arch
> packages that use /usr/local and it's meant for local deviations, so
> wouldn't it be wise not to touch /usr/local?
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2
On Thursday 19 June 2008 17:02, Pierre CHAPUIS wrote:
> If you start vsftpd as a daemon you have to :
>
> - Have listen=YES and background=YES in vsftpd.conf
> - Change line 11 from /etc/rc.d/vsftpd from /usr/sbin/vsftpd & to
> /usr/sbin/vsftpd
Bonjour Pierre. Thanks for the help.
listen=YES wa
If you start vsftpd as a daemon you have to :
- Have listen=YES and background=YES in vsftpd.conf
- Change line 11 from /etc/rc.d/vsftpd from /usr/sbin/vsftpd & to
/usr/sbin/vsftpd
--
catwell
On the new instance of Archlinux, that I've installed on my new machine, I
wanted to avoid downloading all the updates again on my dialup connection, so
thought I'd just FTP the pkg directory from the first install to the new
install. For some reason I cannot start the vsftp daemon, just giving
On Thursday 19 June 2008 08:10, 甘露(Lu Gan) wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Abhishek Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Nigel Henry
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I have Archlinux running on one machine with no problems, but the
> >> instal
Lukáš Jirkovský schrieb:
Can you please add explanation for first change? You have localhost in URI.
Regards
Lukas '6xx' Jirkovsky
The right link is in my first reply to myself:
http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commit;h=f3e064ec822b3dae191e1ae5d2bb921a970af86e
signature.asc
Can you please add explanation for first change? You have localhost in URI.
Regards
Lukas '6xx' Jirkovsky
2008/6/19 RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>
>> I think it is time to release this, here are the changes:
>>
>> - Remove usbfs special handling from rc.sysinit, for exp
Dan McGee wrote:
New filesystem package:
* Bumped the month number
* Updated services/protocols files. These were updated in CVS 3 months
ago but had still not gotten a rebuild, and were lost in the
transition to SVN. This will close FS#9941.
I couldn't build for x86_64, so if someone could do t
Thomas Bächler wrote:
I think it is time to release this, here are the changes:
- Remove usbfs special handling from rc.sysinit, for explanation see
http://localhost/git/?p=arch/initscripts/.git;a=commit;h=f3e064ec822b3dae191e1ae5d2bb921a970af86e
- Make USEDIRECTISA default to no - this is a
Allie Daneman schrieb:
Well thanks a ton for your motivational speech. It's so refreshing to
be on a Linux list that has some balls. I'm an OBSD user trying out
this Arch thingy...this is 1 more reason I like it. Next time I'll
think before I post, sorry for wasting bandwidth ;)
Nothing better
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Allie Daneman schrieb:
Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ?
No, we will use Firefox 2 until end of all times. Firefox 3 will never
come to extra ... in fact we will go back to Firefox 1 next week, Arch
always uses the oldest and most outdated software.
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 15:24 -0700, Allie Daneman wrote:
> Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ?
I'm busy with it, give me a day or two and it will hit testing or extra,
depending on how rebuilds against xulrunner are going.
On 6/19/08, Joe Phantom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Allie Daneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well thanks a ton for your motivational speech.
> Good piece of irony.
>
> I don't understand why so many people responds so aggressively to a
> simple question. ¿Can't
23 matches
Mail list logo