Re: [arch-general] network manager cannot connect to AP with a hidden ssid

2008-06-19 Thread James Rayner
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:54 AM, metin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ? It's just an inherent bit of suckyness with networkmanager. You can try filing a bug with them, but don't expect much response. Or give the 0.7 SVN a go. James

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] filesystem-2008.06-1

2008-06-19 Thread RedShift
Aaron Griffin wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:09 AM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why does this package mess around in /usr/local? IIRC there are no Arch packages that use /usr/local and it's meant for local deviations, so wouldn't it be wise not to touch /usr/local? http://www.pathnam

Re: [arch-general] gdm not found when booting into runlevel 5

2008-06-19 Thread Nigel Henry
On Thursday 19 June 2008 21:48, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:39 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry > >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Is there some file that I need to edit, in ord

Re: [arch-general] network manager cannot connect to AP with a hidden ssid

2008-06-19 Thread metin
?

Re: [arch-general] X errors...

2008-06-19 Thread metin

Re: [arch-general] gdm not found when booting into runlevel 5

2008-06-19 Thread Christian Babeux
David Rosenstrauch wrote: Aaron Griffin wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there some file that I need to edit, in order to use gdm as the display manager? Nigel. You need to edit /etc/inittab Not saying you're wrong, but personally I've nev

Re: [arch-general] gdm not found when booting into runlevel 5

2008-06-19 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:39 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aaron Griffin wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Is there some file that I need to edit, in order to use gdm as the >>> display >>> manager? >>> >>> Nigel. >

Re: [arch-general] gdm not found when booting into runlevel 5

2008-06-19 Thread David Rosenstrauch
Aaron Griffin wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there some file that I need to edit, in order to use gdm as the display manager? Nigel. You need to edit /etc/inittab Not saying you're wrong, but personally I've never edited the inittab file,

Re: [arch-general] gdm not found when booting into runlevel 5

2008-06-19 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I already have one instance of Archlinux installed that has xorg, and KDE > installed, and from looking at /var/cache/pacman/pkg, I also have gdm > installed. Now this instance of Archlinux works fine, and I can login to KDE

[arch-general] gdm not found when booting into runlevel 5

2008-06-19 Thread Nigel Henry
I already have one instance of Archlinux installed that has xorg, and KDE installed, and from looking at /var/cache/pacman/pkg, I also have gdm installed. Now this instance of Archlinux works fine, and I can login to KDE with no problems. The graphics driver is trident, and according to /etc/X1

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] filesystem-2008.06-1

2008-06-19 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:09 AM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why does this package mess around in /usr/local? IIRC there are no Arch > packages that use /usr/local and it's meant for local deviations, so > wouldn't it be wise not to touch /usr/local? http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2

Re: [arch-general] Problem starting vsftpd service. (Don't Panic)

2008-06-19 Thread Nigel Henry
On Thursday 19 June 2008 17:02, Pierre CHAPUIS wrote: > If you start vsftpd as a daemon you have to : > > - Have listen=YES and background=YES in vsftpd.conf > - Change line 11 from /etc/rc.d/vsftpd from /usr/sbin/vsftpd & to > /usr/sbin/vsftpd Bonjour Pierre. Thanks for the help. listen=YES wa

Re: [arch-general] Problem starting vsftpd service. (Don't Panic)

2008-06-19 Thread Pierre CHAPUIS
If you start vsftpd as a daemon you have to : - Have listen=YES and background=YES in vsftpd.conf - Change line 11 from /etc/rc.d/vsftpd from /usr/sbin/vsftpd & to /usr/sbin/vsftpd -- catwell

[arch-general] Problem starting vsftpd service. (Don't Panic)

2008-06-19 Thread Nigel Henry
On the new instance of Archlinux, that I've installed on my new machine, I wanted to avoid downloading all the updates again on my dialup connection, so thought I'd just FTP the pkg directory from the first install to the new install. For some reason I cannot start the vsftp daemon, just giving

Re: [arch-general] Problem with Transient resolver failure with pacman (Don't Panic)

2008-06-19 Thread Nigel Henry
On Thursday 19 June 2008 08:10, 甘露(Lu Gan) wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Abhishek Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Nigel Henry > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have Archlinux running on one machine with no problems, but the > >> instal

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2008.05-1

2008-06-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Lukáš Jirkovský schrieb: Can you please add explanation for first change? You have localhost in URI. Regards Lukas '6xx' Jirkovsky The right link is in my first reply to myself: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commit;h=f3e064ec822b3dae191e1ae5d2bb921a970af86e signature.asc

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2008.05-1

2008-06-19 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Can you please add explanation for first change? You have localhost in URI. Regards Lukas '6xx' Jirkovsky 2008/6/19 RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Thomas Bächler wrote: >> >> I think it is time to release this, here are the changes: >> >> - Remove usbfs special handling from rc.sysinit, for exp

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] filesystem-2008.06-1

2008-06-19 Thread RedShift
Dan McGee wrote: New filesystem package: * Bumped the month number * Updated services/protocols files. These were updated in CVS 3 months ago but had still not gotten a rebuild, and were lost in the transition to SVN. This will close FS#9941. I couldn't build for x86_64, so if someone could do t

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2008.05-1

2008-06-19 Thread RedShift
Thomas Bächler wrote: I think it is time to release this, here are the changes: - Remove usbfs special handling from rc.sysinit, for explanation see http://localhost/git/?p=arch/initscripts/.git;a=commit;h=f3e064ec822b3dae191e1ae5d2bb921a970af86e - Make USEDIRECTISA default to no - this is a

Re: [arch-general] Will Firefox 3 be brought into extra ?

2008-06-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Allie Daneman schrieb: Well thanks a ton for your motivational speech. It's so refreshing to be on a Linux list that has some balls. I'm an OBSD user trying out this Arch thingy...this is 1 more reason I like it. Next time I'll think before I post, sorry for wasting bandwidth ;) Nothing better

Re: [arch-general] Will Firefox 3 be brought into extra ?

2008-06-19 Thread RedShift
Thomas Bächler wrote: Allie Daneman schrieb: Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ? No, we will use Firefox 2 until end of all times. Firefox 3 will never come to extra ... in fact we will go back to Firefox 1 next week, Arch always uses the oldest and most outdated software.

Re: [arch-general] Will Firefox 3 be brought into extra ?

2008-06-19 Thread Jan de Groot
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 15:24 -0700, Allie Daneman wrote: > Will Firefox 3 replace Firefox 2 in a future release ? I'm busy with it, give me a day or two and it will hit testing or extra, depending on how rebuilds against xulrunner are going.

Re: [arch-general] Will Firefox 3 be brought into extra ?

2008-06-19 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On 6/19/08, Joe Phantom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Allie Daneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well thanks a ton for your motivational speech. > Good piece of irony. > > I don't understand why so many people responds so aggressively to a > simple question. ¿Can't