On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:05 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> I've a small dumb question.
> Why not use official branded version when there are many licensing
> problems? According to KISS and Arch philosophy (use upstream apps and
> not to patch unless necessary) this should be a good way.
There's
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Alper KANAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> We, as the Turkish users of Arch Linux, have created our own community
> to support, to translate, to develop our very beloved Linux distro on
> all platforms. As our first gift to the community, we have translat
Hey All,
We, as the Turkish users of Arch Linux, have created our own community
to support, to translate, to develop our very beloved Linux distro on
all platforms. As our first gift to the community, we have translated
pacman completely to Turkish. It's also being tested by our community
right n
I have the same problem. I have a HDA Intel card with a Realtek ALC883 chip.
My `lspci | grep Audio`:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio
Controller (rev 03)
To be able to control each one of the speakers (internal and headphones), I
have this in /etc/modprobe.co
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Scott Weisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One problem I am having that I don't know how to fix is that when I
> plug in headphones, the speakers don't turn off. Alsamixer shows that
> the headphones and speakers have separate controls, something I have
> neve
On 02:37 Wed 11 Jun , Yonathan Dossow wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 08:12 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 01:57 -0400, Yonathan Dossow wrote:
> > > IMHO, to avoid trademark violations we should use IceWeasel.
> >
> > Would it make sense to distribute an iceweasel package
On Wed 2008-06-11 11:28, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Alessio Bolognino
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed 2008-06-11 18:05, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> >> I've a small dumb question.
> >> Why not use official branded version when there are many licensing
> >> problems
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Alessio Bolognino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed 2008-06-11 18:05, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>> I've a small dumb question.
>> Why not use official branded version when there are many licensing
>> problems? According to KISS and Arch philosophy (use upstream apps
> $ pacman -Slq core > core-old.txt
> # pacman -Sy
> $ pacman -Slq core > core-new.txt
> $ diff core-new.txt core-old.txt
Sweet! Between that and the rss feeds I'm good to go!
Thanks all!
On Wed 2008-06-11 18:05, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> I've a small dumb question.
> Why not use official branded version when there are many licensing
> problems? According to KISS and Arch philosophy (use upstream apps and
> not to patch unless necessary) this should be a good way.
But what happens i
I've a small dumb question.
Why not use official branded version when there are many licensing
problems? According to KISS and Arch philosophy (use upstream apps and
not to patch unless necessary) this should be a good way.
Regards
Lukas '6xx' Jirkovsky
2008/6/11 Sam Gwydir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Dave Heistand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Such a diff would tell me things like (output
>
> Packages removed from package tree/ftp servers:
> firefox (installed)
> foobar (not installed)
>
> Packages added to tree/ftp servers
> iceweasel (not installed)
> tmpwatch
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Dave Heistand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Such a diff would tell me things like (output
>
> Packages removed from package tree/ftp servers:
> firefox (installed)
> foobar (not installed)
>
> Packages added to tree/ftp servers
> iceweasel (not installed)
> tmpwatch
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 03:40:11PM +0200, Dennis Herbrich wrote:
> > What I'm looking for is a way to see a diff of my package cache prior to
> > and just after syncing, i.e. what packages are out of date (which pacman
> > does show), what packages have been removed from the repositories since my
>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Arch in 99% of cases uses mandir=/usr/share/man, sysconfdir=/etc, and
> never installs things under /usr/local. We don't want to enforce
> things like that at the makepkg level however, you are free to build
> local package h
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dave Heistand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 04:16:07PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Dave Heistand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > To me Arch package building is refreshing when compared to my experiences
>> >
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 04:16:07PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Dave Heistand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > To me Arch package building is refreshing when compared to my experiences
> > with
> > ebuilds and rpm spec files. I can't seem to find a list of all the var
On Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 04:3341PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Alper KANAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a user, I really dislike the name Iceweasel... I really dislike its logo
> > and so on...
> >
>
> Good for you! Then what?
Then find a different name. Iceweasel i
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Alper KANAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a user, I really dislike the name Iceweasel... I really dislike its logo
> and so on...
>
Good for you! Then what?
> Please don't change it unless you have to..
Did you actually read the thread?
We have to, according to
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Dave Heistand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To me Arch package building is refreshing when compared to my experiences with
> ebuilds and rpm spec files. I can't seem to find a list of all the varibles
> that can be used in a PKGBUILD script though (like $startdir
On Wed, June 11, 2008 14:45, Dave Heistand wrote:
> Hi,
Greetings!
> What I'm looking for is a way to see a diff of my package cache prior to
> and just after syncing, i.e. what packages are out of date (which pacman
> does show), what packages have been removed from the repositories since my
> la
As a user, I really dislike the name Iceweasel... I really dislike its
logo and so on... Please don't change it unless you have to..
Alper KANAT
http://raptiye.org
Alessio Bolognino yazmış:
On Wed 2008-06-11 05:46, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino wrote:
There is a thing that I have never understo
Hi,
For various personal reasons including the rolling release model (which is
critical to me), easy package building and availability of binary packages and
build scripts I'm considering changing to arch. I do have a few questions
that I can't seem to find the answers to, sorry if they are cover
Hello,
I just obtained a Fujitsu P7120 notebook (a very nice model, by the way).
Overall, I am getting this working with Arch just fine (although I
would definitely appreciate pointers from anyone else who has
installed Arch, especially as I have been using a desktop until now
and haven't had the
24 matches
Mail list logo
