On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 08:12 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 01:57 -0400, Yonathan Dossow wrote:
> > IMHO, to avoid trademark violations we should use IceWeasel.
>
> Would it make sense to distribute an iceweasel package with a binary
> inside it called "firefox"?
i'm not sure(i
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 01:57 -0400, Yonathan Dossow wrote:
> IMHO, to avoid trademark violations we should use IceWeasel.
Would it make sense to distribute an iceweasel package with a binary
inside it called "firefox"? Mozilla Corporation should fix their binary
names, installation prefix, etc to g
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 22:52 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Alessio Bolognino
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox
> > package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the
> > artwork, and
On Tue 2008-06-10 22:52, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Alessio Bolognino
> > [...]
>
> Sure we name our package firefox- after the binary named firefox
> contained within. When they fix their build process to name the
> unbranded binary differently, perhaps we can adjust our
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Alessio Bolognino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox
> package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the
> artwork, and that's fine; but are we sure we can name that package
> "fire
On Wed 2008-06-11 05:46, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino wrote:
> There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox
> package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the
> artwork, and that's fine; but are we sure we can name that package
> "firefox" ? If you ask it
There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox
package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the
artwork, and that's fine; but are we sure we can name that package
"firefox" ? If you ask it to me, I think we can not:
Mike Connor (a Mozilla guy :) said he
that pkgbuild worked great for me. Thanks!
On Tue, June 10, 2008 10:32, Chris Bolton wrote:
> if you go to that bug page, and follow the link to the upstream bug
> report, apparently there's a patch that fixed. Unfortunately, I have no
> idea how to apply that patch. can someone provide instructions? thanks.
I uploaded a PKGBUILD integrati
if you go to that bug page, and follow the link to the upstream bug
report, apparently there's a patch that fixed. Unfortunately, I have no
idea how to apply that patch. can someone provide instructions? thanks.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10613
Lyman wrote:
Hi, all
It is a little weird that all my GTK applications (eg, pidgin && pcmanx)
can not remember their last position today. Instead, they all appear at
top-left corner.
I've no idea what could be wrong. Any ideas?
lyman
Hi, all
It is a little weird that all my GTK applications (eg, pidgin && pcmanx)
can not remember their last position today. Instead, they all appear at
top-left corner.
I've no idea what could be wrong. Any ideas?
lyman
12 matches
Mail list logo
