Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
2008/6/3 Michael Schmarck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi. > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Now the site is working for me =) > > Still broken for me. > > XML-Verarbeitungsfehler: nicht wohlgeformt > Adresse: http://arch-graphics.kx.cz/ > Zeile N

Re: [arch-general] should gawk be in group base-devel?

2008-06-03 Thread Jan de Groot
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 18:03 +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > 2008/6/3 Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Neil Darlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It is often quoted that, for package building purposes, it is assumed a > >> user > >> has packages

Re: [arch-general] should gawk be in group base-devel?

2008-06-03 Thread Aaron Schaefer
>>> It is often quoted that, for package building purposes, it is assumed a user >>> has packages in group base-devel installed. >> >> Ideally, the user should have BOTH base and base-devel installed for >> package building. > > +1. > When user omits any package from base - it's on his/her own risk

[arch-general] For any users unable to send to the ML

2008-06-03 Thread Daenyth Blank
I've had problems recently with all messages sent to the ML being dropped silently. With the help of cactus, I found that it was because I use "Daenyth+arch@" as my address, and I was sending mail from "Daenyth@". In Gmail, the fix is to go to settings -> accounts, and add a new account sending fro

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Sergej Pupykin
Hi, Did you add it to http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories ?

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Michael Schmarck
Hi. On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now the site is working for me =) Still broken for me. XML-Verarbeitungsfehler: nicht wohlgeformt Adresse: http://arch-graphics.kx.cz/ Zeile Nr. 17, Spalte 907:http://www.jobpilot.cz/";>Práce

Re: [arch-general] Can't boot from /usr on LVM

2008-06-03 Thread Michael Schmarck
Hello! On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Jesse Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 18:14:22 +, Michael Schmarck wrote: [...] >> HOOKS="base udev keymap autodetect pata lvm2 filesystems" > > Not that it could hurt with it included (with the exception of bloating > your init

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Graziano Giuliani
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 18:11 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: [...] > Where is the problem? I'll try to fix it, if I can. [...] No more problems now. Thank You for Your nice repo! Graziano.

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Davide Lo Re
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now the site is working for me =) working! Davide

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat
Now the site is working for me =) On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/3 Graziano Giuliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:39 -0500, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat wrote: >>> I am getting this error when trying to browse your site: >> [...]

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
2008/6/3 Graziano Giuliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:39 -0500, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat wrote: >> I am getting this error when trying to browse your site: > [...] > > Seems some nice ADS from ISP. Nice packages, but pacman chokes. > > animorph-0.3-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
2008/6/3 Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am getting this error when trying to browse your site: > > XML Parsing Error: not well-formed > Location: http://arch-graphics.kx.cz/ > Line Number 17, Column 907: href="http://www.jobpilot.cz/";>Práce, brigády | href="http:/

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Johannes Held
"Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am getting this error when trying to browse your site: I can view his site quite normal. No errors here. -- Gruß, Johannes Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut. http://cryptocd.eduforge.org/online_version signature.asc Descript

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Graziano Giuliani
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:39 -0500, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat wrote: > I am getting this error when trying to browse your site: [...] Seems some nice ADS from ISP. Nice packages, but pacman chokes. animorph-0.3-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz01-Jun-2008 14:24 423K arch-graphics.db.tar.gz

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Davide Lo Re
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am getting this error when trying to browse your site: [snip] same here. Davide

Re: [arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Gustavo A. Gómez Farhat
I am getting this error when trying to browse your site: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed Location: http://arch-graphics.kx.cz/ Line Number 17, Column 907: http://www.jobpilot.cz/";>Práce, brigády | http://adserver.itsfogo.com/click.aspx?zoneid=21448";>Sázení na sport | http://adv

Re: [arch-general] should gawk be in group base-devel?

2008-06-03 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2008/6/3 Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Neil Darlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It is often quoted that, for package building purposes, it is assumed a user >> has packages in group base-devel installed. > > Ideally, the user should have BOTH base

[arch-general] Arch-graphics unofficial repository

2008-06-03 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi, I would like to announce my small unofficial Arch-graphics repository. It's aimed to provide some graphics-related packages (mostly 3D related graphics as renderers and so). Unfortunately there are only i686 packages, because I don't have any x86_64 machine. Why I've made my own repository? It

Re: [arch-general] should gawk be in group base-devel?

2008-06-03 Thread Travis Willard
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Neil Darlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > It is often quoted that, for package building purposes, it is assumed a user > has packages in group base-devel installed. Ideally, the user should have BOTH base and base-devel installed for package building.

[arch-general] should gawk be in group base-devel?

2008-06-03 Thread Neil Darlow
Hi, It is often quoted that, for package building purposes, it is assumed a user has packages in group base-devel installed. gawk is part of base but a user could deselect it within the Arch Installer. Does it make sense to add gawk to group base-devel so that its presence is mandated by the