Re: [arch-general] For the person who manage the RSS feed (packages)

2008-05-27 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks very much for appending i686/x86_64 to the filename. This makes it very > much better. > > See you, Attila Thanks to Eliott (cactus) for doing that so quick !

[arch-general] For the person who manage the RSS feed (packages)

2008-05-27 Thread Attila
Hi, thanks very much for appending i686/x86_64 to the filename. This makes it very much better. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] aufs with kernel 2.6.25

2008-05-27 Thread David Rosenstrauch
Chris Bolton wrote: Michael Towers wrote: Hi there, Is anyone else having problems with aufs and the new kernel (2.6.25.4-1, i686)? Here it is a bit of a disaster - I mount it and that was the end of the session, no message, complete system lock up, hard reset necessary. Here is my simple

Re: [arch-general] resurrecting srcpac

2008-05-27 Thread Jason Chu
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Loui wrote: >> On Sat, 24 May 2008 10:20:37 -0700 >> "Jason Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac? I >> > guess if you use sudo, that won't quite work...

Re: [arch-general] resurrecting srcpac

2008-05-27 Thread Travis Willard
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not clear, at least not to me: > >- undecided whether to keep the package specific configs in /etc/srcpac.d > or in /var/srcpac Of the two, I'd suggest /etc/srcpac.d - it's essentially configuration data. >-

Re: [arch-general] resurrecting srcpac

2008-05-27 Thread Michael Klier
Loui wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2008 10:20:37 -0700 > "Jason Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac? I > > guess if you use sudo, that won't quite work... you'd need something > > pointing back to that user... > > > > I'm a little con