Am Mittwoch 21 Mai 2008 00:26:29 schrieb Juergen Starek:
> Hello everybody,
>
> a few days ago, my Eclipse installation (which had worked fine for some
> months before that) stopped working. Eclipse will start, but only to the
> end of its initialization routine. The splash screen does not disappea
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:46 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/20/08, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>>
>> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:05 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Problem is, though, since Arch recently turned o
On 5/20/08, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:05 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Problem is, though, since Arch recently turned on HashKnownHosts by
> default
> > > in ssh_config, those 2 lines in the kno
Thomas Bächler wrote:
I didn't find out about this change until much later - and it pissed me
off. For no apparent reason, we changed the default configuration of
openssh at one point and now I have an obfuscated known_hosts file.
I agree - it would have been better for there to have been a bi
Juergen Starek wrote:
Hello everybody,
a few days ago, my Eclipse installation (which had worked fine for some
months before that) stopped working.
I'm out of ideas at the moment regarding possible causes for that error.
So I'd like to ask here whether anyone thinks that any updates to Arch
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:05 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Problem is, though, since Arch recently turned on HashKnownHosts by default
in ssh_config, those 2 lines in the known_hosts file are encrypted, and so I
don't know which host machines that I've
Hello everybody,
a few days ago, my Eclipse installation (which had worked fine for some
months before that) stopped working. Eclipse will start, but only to the
end of its initialization routine. The splash screen does not disappear.
I realize this is no Eclipse support list, and hence will ju
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 23:55:38 Mordechai Peller wrote:
> Like with firing a gun, it depends on the context.
Yeah, well, while reading your email:
"Why yes, I just so happened to be holding the gun and pulling the
trigger when it went off. But honestly, it was the gun's fault. If the
manufact
Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
It is obvious that you are doing something wrong whenever you shot a gun but
not when you use a mail client and you top-post. Of course it is not the
same "wrong" but my point was about the *knowledge*.
Like with firing a gun, it depends on the context. Just as I cou
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Anyone know if there's any way to decrypt the hashes created by the
HashKnownHosts setting?
I think the whole point is that they *are* one way hashes. The only
think I can think of is to find the algorithm they use (sha1?) and
hash the hostnames that you know, then compare.
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 19:43:13 metin wrote:
> any ideas?
Are you using iwl3945? If so, don't bother trying it because is a known
problem.
--
Blog: damnshock.blogspot.com
Fotolog:www.fotolog.com/damnshock
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 10:33:16 eliott wrote:
> How do I shot email?
Is this a joke or what?
It is obvious that you are doing something wrong whenever you shot a gun but
not when you use a mail client and you top-post. Of course it is not the
same "wrong" but my point was about the *knowledge*
any ideas?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:05 PM, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just on a whim, I decided to try out the Debian tool to scan for weak keys
> resulting from the recent openssl security hole. And lo and behold, it
> found 2 weak keys in my known_hosts file!
>
> Problem is, though, s
Just on a whim, I decided to try out the Debian tool to scan for weak
keys resulting from the recent openssl security hole. And lo and
behold, it found 2 weak keys in my known_hosts file!
Problem is, though, since Arch recently turned on HashKnownHosts by
default in ssh_config, those 2 lines
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:52 AM, jason maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:43 AM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I guess you don't like HTML email as well :-(
>
> Neither did Hitler's Nazi regime.
>
Ok, ok, you win this round. But it was a willful invocation o
> On 5/20/08, Marc Deop i Argemà <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 03:08:14 Mordechai Peller wrote:
>> > "Why yes, I just so happened to be holding the gun and pulling the
>> trigger when it went off. But honestly, it was the gun's fault. If
>> the manufacture hadn't designed
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:43 AM, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess you *don't* like HTML email as well :-(
>
Neither did Hitler's Nazi regime.
Hi
On 20.05.2008 14:52, Xavier wrote:
Btw quite != quiet.
I first thought it was a funny typo when you said you were quiet busy,
but you made it twice in a row, so I am not sure anymore :)
even if it's hard to believe now: it's indeed a typo ;) had an accident
some days ago, so my right hand
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Michael Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It works quiet good for me.
Btw quite != quiet.
I first thought it was a funny typo when you said you were quiet busy,
but you made it twice in a row, so I am not sure anymore :)
Hi,
there has been some security updates for packages in Core that have
been upgraded and have been lying in Testing for a long while. The ones
that come to mind are bzip2 and openssh but there might be more. Is
there any reason those havent moved yet?
As far as i can see bzip2 is missing some si
Hi,
On 19.05.2008 01:38, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
If anyone tried something like that on linux, please share your experience.
Maybe i could use a mobile with bluetooth as well.
I use the the Huawei E220 USB Modem which is sold by various vendors
(e.g. t-mobile, o2, ... in Germany) for UM
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can confirm it does not happen with the official binaries, although the
icons do not show but that could be because I ran it from my home directory.
I have also rebuilt via abs to get branding
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can confirm it does not happen with the official binaries, although the
> icons do not show but that could be because I ran it from my home directory.
> I have also rebuilt via abs to get branding and that does not help.
On 19.05.2008 19:01, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
Let me start with a P3 800MHz I have running arch.
Normal wait time: ~11.5s
acpi=off wait time: ~5s
What about yours?
it's 992ms
Linux 2.6.25 #20 SMP Tue May 20 12:18:39 CEST 2008 i686 Genuine Intel(R)
CPU L2300 @ 1.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linu
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another arch PC I've got, a 2GHz P4 this time:
>
> Normal udev settling: ~5.5s
> acpi=off: ~4s
>
> It's a bit too much wasting 5s (or >10s for old PCs) just waiting, isn't it?
Its 7s on my 1.7GHz AMD i686 and 730ms
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Schaefer wrote:
>>
>> On 20.05.2008 13:07, Xavier wrote:
>>>
>>> It might also be interesting to see what happens with mozilla binaries
>>> (just download thunderbird for linux from mozilla site).
>>
>> Unfortunately
Michael Schaefer wrote:
On 20.05.2008 13:07, Xavier wrote:
It might also be interesting to see what happens with mozilla binaries
(just download thunderbird for linux from mozilla site).
Unfortunately i don't have the time to debug this at the moment cause
i'm quiet busy. but when rebooting a
On 20.05.2008 13:07, Xavier wrote:
It might also be interesting to see what happens with mozilla binaries
(just download thunderbird for linux from mozilla site).
i tried the thunderbird 2.0.0.14 binary from mozilla.org now and it
works perfect for me. everything works as expected.
cheers -
Am Dienstag 20 Mai 2008 13:27:19 schrieb Michael Schaefer:
> On 20.05.2008 13:07, Xavier wrote:
> > It might also be interesting to see what happens with mozilla binaries
> > (just download thunderbird for linux from mozilla site).
>
> Unfortunately i don't have the time to debug this at the moment
On 20.05.2008 13:07, Xavier wrote:
It might also be interesting to see what happens with mozilla binaries
(just download thunderbird for linux from mozilla site).
Unfortunately i don't have the time to debug this at the moment cause
i'm quiet busy. but when rebooting and x shutting down i saw
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Michael Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seems to be something really wrong. Could you do me a davor and
> send my your thunderbird 2.0.0.12 package from your cache via email?
> Unfortunately i flushed my cache some days ago and can't find the old
> 12er
There seems to be something really wrong. Could you do me a davor and
send my your thunderbird 2.0.0.12 package from your cache via email?
Unfortunately i flushed my cache some days ago and can't find the old
12er package anywhere.
thank you in advance - Michael
On 20.05.2008 12:55, ert256 wrote
I have opposite problem after upgrade to 2.0.0.14
I can see JPEG attachment only, there is no text in the window.
After downgrading to 2.0.0.12 everything is back to normal.
Michael Schaefer pisze:
> Hello everybody,
>
> after upgrading to thunderbird 2.0.0.14 i cannot open attachments
> anymore
Dimitrios Apostolou schrieb:
Another arch PC I've got, a 2GHz P4 this time:
Normal udev settling: ~5.5s
acpi=off: ~4s
It's a bit too much wasting 5s (or >10s for old PCs) just waiting, isn't it?
It's no waste of time, the entire hardware detection and initialization
is done in those 5 second
Another arch PC I've got, a 2GHz P4 this time:
Normal udev settling: ~5.5s
acpi=off: ~4s
It's a bit too much wasting 5s (or >10s for old PCs) just waiting, isn't it?
Dimitris
Hello everybody,
after upgrading to thunderbird 2.0.0.14 i cannot open attachments
anymore or rather see them. Before opening an email the attachment
symbol still appears in the list but when opened i just see the textbody
and the symbol (speaking about the paper-clip) disappears.
Furthermore
I spent a few hours the other night fiddling around with metalinks and aria2.
I came up with an extremely stupid script I wrote for fun.
I recommend nobody use it.
That being said.. here it is. :)
http://code.cactuswax.net/git/?p=random.git;a=blob_plain;f=pacgobbler/pacgobbler.bash;hb=HEAD
The
Idézés Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 15:55 +0900, Bendany Qian wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I just have a sugguestion about the pkg format.
> >
> > Currently archlinux is using gzip compress method to pack the
> > package, I think it is better to use bzip2. since bzip2 f
I guess you don't like HTML email as well
:-(
Xavier wrote:
http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
What about using a consistent style, at least for one given ML?
arch-general is really painful to read sometimes.
Thanks!
I guess you /don't/ like HTML email as well :-(
Xavier wrote:
http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
What about using a consistent style, at least for one given ML?
arch-general is really painful to read sometimes.
Thanks!
On 5/20/08, Marc Deop i Argemí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 03:08:14 Mordechai Peller wrote:
> > "Why yes, I just so happened to be holding the gun and pulling the
> > trigger when it went off. But honestly, it was the gun's fault. If the
> > manufacture hadn't designed th
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Pacman itself is ready for .tar.bz2 package files. The whole issue
> with .bz2 files is that compression and decompression times increase a
> lot without giving the same amount of size reduction back. We've done
> some re
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 15:55 +0900, Bendany Qian wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just have a sugguestion about the pkg format.
>
> Currently archlinux is using gzip compress method to pack the
> package, I think it is better to use bzip2. since bzip2 format
> can save about 10%-20% disk space than gzip.
>
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 03:08:14 Mordechai Peller wrote:
> "Why yes, I just so happened to be holding the gun and pulling the
> trigger when it went off. But honestly, it was the gun's fault. If the
> manufacture hadn't designed the gun to fire the bullet, none of this
> would ever have happened."
Bendany Qian wrote:
I just have a sugguestion about the pkg format.
That is a very common suggestion. See
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/2264 for more information.
Allan
46 matches
Mail list logo
