What's the status of the 2.6.25 kernel in testing? Any showstoppers
left?
Regards,
Hussam Al-Tayeb.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:11:48PM +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > > And I don't hear much complaints about the distro-patching from
> > > developers (exceptions: Jörg Schilling for example). A bit going
> > > further, I think that "patchability" is one of the main power of
> > > open source; and I se
> > And I don't hear much complaints about the distro-patching from
> > developers (exceptions: Jörg Schilling for example). A bit going
> > further, I think that "patchability" is one of the main power of
> > open source; and I see nothing wrong (fundamentally) in the common
> > practice, that dis
Nagy Gabor wrote:
No big deal. (I've rebuilt it.) But if you also think, that it should be
rebuilt, then why is sitting that buggy package in repo? I have the feeling
that the main reason of "no patch" is minimizing the
developer-responsibility, which is in fact understandable. To be
honest, I do
> Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > An example: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5861
> > This is quite an old bug, and we are just waiting and waiting...
> >
>
> Sometimes packagers are slow, sometimes upstream is slow. This is not
> so surprising, the time of open source developers is always too
> limited :
5 matches
Mail list logo
