On Dienstag, 29. April 2008 00:40 Alessio Bolognino wrote:
> Pacman's changelog support was added to reflect "package's changes", not
> "upstream changes"; that's what frugalware devs are doing, and they use
> (almost) the same package manager.
Yes that is right and i don't think that anyone will
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well if a changelog consisting of:
> upgpkg: gimp 2.5.0-2
> upgpkg: gimp 2.5.0-1
> upgpkg: gimp 2.4.9-1
> upgpkg: gimp 2.4.8-1
> upgpkg: gimp 2.4.7-1
>
> helps you, then file a support request or something. I don't find
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Scott Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Alessio Bolognino
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Pacman's changelog support was added to reflect "package's changes", not
> > "upstream changes"; that's what frugalware devs are do
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Alessio Bolognino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pacman's changelog support was added to reflect "package's changes", not
> "upstream changes"; that's what frugalware devs are doing, and they use
> (almost) the same package manager.
Interesting, it seems you're co
On Mon 2008-04-28 16:32 , Scott Horowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Alessio Bolognino
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually there is the support for packages' changelog, but few maintainers
> > write
> > them.
>
> Wouldn't changelogs more reflect upstream changes than Arch pa
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Alessio Bolognino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually there is the support for packages' changelog, but few maintainers
> write
> them.
Wouldn't changelogs more reflect upstream changes than Arch packaging changes?
Scott
On Tue 2008-04-29 00:17 , Peter Galiovsky wrote:
> [...]
> I was just curious if there is any single place where, for example,
> changelogs for packages can be found.
>
> Maybe it could be created automatically from SVN log messages.
>
> (Yeah, I know, I can implement it if I really want it.)
Act
Xavier __ 28.04.2008 15:47
And as far as I can see, the testing repo is what it means : for testing!
Packages are tested, and breakages / changes are often found during
that period. When these changes are normal and/or unavoidable, an
announcement is usually made before they are pushed to core /
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:07:02PM +0200, Peter Galiovsky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > after doing a system upgrade after some months, I found out the hard way
> > that the HAL support was removed from xorg-server.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:07:02PM +0200, Peter Galiovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after doing a system upgrade after some months, I found out the hard way
> that the HAL support was removed from xorg-server. I wasted a full hour
> trying to get my keyboard layouts back before realizing my recreated p
Hello,
after doing a system upgrade after some months, I found out the hard way
that the HAL support was removed from xorg-server. I wasted a full hour
trying to get my keyboard layouts back before realizing my recreated
policy file is fine, it is just not being used...
Is there any place --
11 matches
Mail list logo
