> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:02:51PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > i am getting my new shinny Quad Core desktop machine tomorrow and i am
>> > thinking of running x86_64 on that machine.
>> > I neve
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:02:51PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > i am getting my new shinny Quad Core desktop machine tomorrow and i am
> > thinking of running x86_64 on that machine.
> > I never really di
Le Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:02:51 -0500,
"Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Why would we do this? The point of having two architectures in one
> distribution is to MERGE things, not further separate them.
Moreover, these architectures are about the same and have been merged in the
kernel
Am Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:09:28 +0300
schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> i am getting my new shinny Quad Core desktop machine tomorrow and i am
> thinking of running x86_64 on that machine.
> I never really did bother getting familiar with that part of Archlinux
> until now since
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> i am getting my new shinny Quad Core desktop machine tomorrow and i am
> thinking of running x86_64 on that machine.
> I never really did bother getting familiar with that part of Archlinux
> until now since
Hi,
i am getting my new shinny Quad Core desktop machine tomorrow and i am
thinking of running x86_64 on that machine.
I never really did bother getting familiar with that part of Archlinux
until now since i didnt have a reason to. Browsing the wiki and forum
today made me realise that there is no
6 matches
Mail list logo
