Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] initscripts changes

2008-04-08 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2008/4/8, Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:22:26 +0200 > Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Moore > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > One of the reasons I stay subscribed to this list is > > > so that I can learn more about

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] initscripts changes

2008-04-08 Thread Geoff
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:22:26 +0200 Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Moore > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > One of the reasons I stay subscribed to this list is > > so that I can learn more about my system. In that > > light, would you mind sharing with

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] initscripts changes

2008-04-08 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One of the reasons I stay subscribed to this list is so that I can learn more > about my system. In that light, would you mind sharing with us why exactly > you > did drop the idea? I would really like to know. > http

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] initscripts changes

2008-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Coacci
On 4/8/08, David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thomas Bächler wrote: > [snip] > > > >> Simple as in a technical standpoint, says that it should be mounted in > >> fstab. Why? Because fstab is the place were filesystems that should be > >> m

Re: [arch-general] Hardcoded or not

2008-04-08 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2008/4/8, gan lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I put my words here but it's just my opinion: > 1. Arch's devs are great and cute. > 2. I am against to hardcoded-things. > 3. If possible, I prefer what has been hardcoded in file system mounting > should put int one file: fstab. > 4. Should I open a bug tr