Re: [arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4.3382

2008-03-17 Thread Varun Acharya
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:29:15PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > > Hi > > bump of madwifi drivers, back to trunk version > > please signoff both arches > > also users can signoff, no respond from any dev > > > >

[arch-general] Grub and GPT partition labels

2008-03-17 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Hello, are there any plans to prepare our grub with support for GPT partition labels? The grub version from current install ISO could not be installed on such a prepared harddisk: Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0xee Good old lilo on the other side works like a charm ;-) There must be pa

Re: [arch-general] HAL mounts CDs, doesn't mount DVDs

2008-03-17 Thread Ravi Desai
I thought that the cd/dvd/floppy sections of fstab are commented out when using HAL (So says the HAL wikipage). So this should not make any difference. Vinay S Shastry wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Renan Birck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roman Kyrylych wrote: > > > What files

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4.3382

2008-03-17 Thread Gerhard Brauer
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:29:15PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi > bump of madwifi drivers, back to trunk version > please signoff both arches > also users can signoff, no respond from any dev > > bump at least anyone? Again: user signoff for i686 > greetings > tpowa Gerhard -- Wir si

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4.3382

2008-03-17 Thread Filip Wojciechowski
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > bump of madwifi drivers, back to trunk version > please signoff both arches > also users can signoff, no respond from any dev > > bump at least anyone? User signoff - x86_64. Filip

[arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4.3382

2008-03-17 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi bump of madwifi drivers, back to trunk version please signoff both arches also users can signoff, no respond from any dev bump at least anyone? greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc De

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Processor Generation++

2008-03-17 Thread RedShift
Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am Montag, 17. März 2008 10:11:15 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: My opinion on this, why to desupport something which might be still used, also we all know that x86_64 is the future and therefore i don't think the benefit is worth the trouble. In addition to this MMX would no