Re: [arch-general] initscripts-splash

2008-03-13 Thread dongiovanni
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:58 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hallo, >> >> Currently I'm maintaining splashy and fbsplash. Some time ago there was >> a >> discussion of integration of the splash hooks in the initscripts in >> [core]. >> Is there something planed? It would reduce problems fo

Re: [arch-general] initscripts-splash

2008-03-13 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:58 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo, > > Currently I'm maintaining splashy and fbsplash. Some time ago there was a > discussion of integration of the splash hooks in the initscripts in > [core]. > Is there something planed? It would reduce problems for some less

[arch-general] initscripts-splash

2008-03-13 Thread dongiovanni
Hallo, Currently I'm maintaining splashy and fbsplash. Some time ago there was a discussion of integration of the splash hooks in the initscripts in [core]. Is there something planed? It would reduce problems for some less experienced users. If this isn't possible, can someone update initscripts-

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] pcmciautils

2008-03-13 Thread Gerhard Brauer
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:27:59PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi > fixed udev rules file to use load-modules.sh instead of plain modprobe. > signoff for both arches, please Sorry, don't have seen this mail... Could do a user signoff for i686 Do some base tests and overall my card works fine

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4.3382

2008-03-13 Thread Gerhard Brauer
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 06:36:57PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi > bump of madwifi drivers, back to trunk version > please signoff both arches > also users can signoff, no respond from any dev user signoff for i686 Tobias: i could also signoff pcmciautils 014-4 for i686. Do some base tests

[arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4.3382

2008-03-13 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi bump of madwifi drivers, back to trunk version please signoff both arches also users can signoff, no respond from any dev greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a dig

Re: [arch-general] Problems with keyboardinput

2008-03-13 Thread Johannes Held
Thank you very much. I'll go and try! -- Gruß, Johannes Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut. http://cryptocd.eduforge.org/online_version signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] Problems with keyboardinput

2008-03-13 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2008/3/12, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> May someone show me the maillinglistarchive of this ML? > >> Then I try to find it. > > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/ > > > Thank you. > I looked through these mails quite a bit - but I didn't find my

Re: [arch-general] Problems with keyboardinput

2008-03-13 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2008/3/13, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/3/12, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > >> May someone show me the maillinglistarchive of this ML? > > >> Then I try to find it. > > > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/ > > > > > > Tha

Re: [arch-general] udev-118-5 udev.rules.pacsave

2008-03-13 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Donnerstag, 13. März 2008 schrieb Neil Darlow: > Hi, > > Is it safe to delete /etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules.pacsave following the > update? > > Regards, > Neil Darlow yes all shoould be covered by the new rules files, if you have concerns or breakage keep it as backup. greetings tpowa -- Tobi

[arch-general] udev-118-5 udev.rules.pacsave

2008-03-13 Thread Neil Darlow
Hi, Is it safe to delete /etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules.pacsave following the update? Regards, Neil Darlow