> Stephen Wilkinson schrieb:
>> I tried booting into different run levels (adding 1 or 3 to the kernel
>> line of grub), but it makes no difference.
> I'm no dev - but as far as I know the bsd-style initscripts gave
> ArchLinux no runlevels like you find them in SysV-style systems like
> Debian or
Hey There,
I want to use my fingerprint scanner to login through GDM and GNOME
Screensaver... I can do this right now partially... It always asks for
my password which is maybe secure but annoying at the same time..
I want to use fingerprint login first and if it fails then I want to use
pas
Stephen Wilkinson schrieb:
I tried booting into different run levels (adding 1 or 3 to the kernel
line of grub), but it makes no difference.
I'm no dev - but as far as I know the bsd-style initscripts gave
ArchLinux no runlevels like you find them in SysV-style systems like
Debian or SUSE.
Run
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/29, Stephen Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > After kernel upgrade I got kernel panics because I hadn't changed
> > initrd26.img to kernel26.img and /dev/hda5 to /dev/sda5 in Grub's
> > menu.lst (as you can s
2008/2/29, Stephen Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello everyone,
>
> After upgrading the kernel alone (and after fixing some kernel panics
> -- see postscript) the boot sequence now stops at loading the modules
> ([DONE]) and goes no further: the cursor blinks and I can type
> characters, bu
Hello everyone,
After upgrading the kernel alone (and after fixing some kernel panics
-- see postscript) the boot sequence now stops at loading the modules
([DONE]) and goes no further: the cursor blinks and I can type
characters, but I never get a shell prompt. It seems the boot sequence
doesn't
solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
Have you read the changelog? It's hardly worth being excited for...
yes you're right.
i was hoping a part of it was missing or hidden somewhere else on there
site... but it does not seem so.
is it this ?
http://www.kde.org/announcements/changelogs/changelog3_5_8to3_
On Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2008 18:49 Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> yes we will, sorry im pretty busy right now and have build troubles also on
> x86_64,
Good luck and thanks.
> also i try to move everything to /usr.
Is this really necessary to do this with the probably last 3.5.x branch? From
my
> Have you read the changelog? It's hardly worth being excited for...
yes you're right.
i was hoping a part of it was missing or hidden somewhere else on there
site... but it does not seem so.
is it this ?
http://www.kde.org/announcements/changelogs/changelog3_5_8to3_5_9.php
On Friday 29 February 2008, RedShift wrote:
> Have you read the changelog? It's hardly worth being excited for...
>
> Glenn
Well, the PIM suite has been updated to the enterprise branch which is a good
reason for me to update to 3.5.9 :D
Damnshock
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
10 matches
Mail list logo