Re: [arch-general] KDE4 Anyone?

2008-01-19 Thread Mark Constable
On 20 Jan 2008 09:26, RedShift wrote: > > So have anyone got up and running with KDE4 on Arch? I know about kdemod > > testing, but they miss some dependencies (tapioca-qt, strigi...), so to > > do those by hand i'd prefer to do all myself :-P Aparently waiting on pacman 3.1.1, in a few days, to

Re: [arch-general] KDE4 Anyone?

2008-01-19 Thread RedShift
Rodrigo Coacci wrote: So have anyone got up and running with KDE4 on Arch? I know about kdemod testing, but they miss some dependencies (tapioca-qt, strigi...), so to do those by hand i'd prefer to do all myself :-P Also, any ideas on when we'll get KDE4 on extra or even testing? -- Cheers

Re: [arch-general] KDE4 Anyone?

2008-01-19 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Rodrigo Coacci wrote: > So have anyone got up and running with KDE4 on Arch? I know about kdemod > testing, but they miss some dependencies (tapioca-qt, strigi...), so to do > those by hand i'd prefer to do all myself :-P Have you tried Tardo's repo? > Also, any ideas

Re: [arch-general] KDE4 Anyone?

2008-01-19 Thread wd
Seemes waiting KDE4.1 now? 2008/1/20, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So have anyone got up and running with KDE4 on Arch? I know about kdemod > testing, but they miss some dependencies (tapioca-qt, strigi...), so to do > those by hand i'd prefer to do all myself :-P > Also, any ideas on w

[arch-general] KDE4 Anyone?

2008-01-19 Thread Rodrigo Coacci
So have anyone got up and running with KDE4 on Arch? I know about kdemod testing, but they miss some dependencies (tapioca-qt, strigi...), so to do those by hand i'd prefer to do all myself :-P Also, any ideas on when we'll get KDE4 on extra or even testing? -- Cheers Rodrigo A computer is