On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:52:51PM -0500, Jeff Mickey wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 2:32 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Just to be honest here, it says you can't supply them in any form that
> adds value to *commercial* products. We are not using our .iso files
> for c
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 12:54 -0500, Travis Willard wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2007 11:48 AM, Karolina Lindqvist
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > söndag 16 december 2007 skrev Mister Dobalina:
> >
> As far as the way Arch currently is, we started out with i686 and
> expanded to include x86_64 when it beca
richard terry wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:05:47 pm you wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> which virtualbox package did you install?
>
> virtualbox-ose
> virtualbox-ose-additions
> virtualbox-ose-additions-modules
>
>
> Also, I removed all of these, compiled the AUR version and ran that, again
> no
On Dec 19, 2007 2:32 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
Just to be honest here, it says you can't supply them in any form that
adds value to *commercial* products. We are not using our .iso files
for commercial value, and thus do not violate this part of the
license. Oh, a
On Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2007 19:07 Jan de Groot wrote:
> Why is checking strict wrong? If the official name of an architecture is
> i686, and we make all packages have the i686 extension, why would aai686
> be allowed then?
Sorry, i want only to show why i586 don't works and i decide to make an
>> BTW, *IF* arch is putting this on the 'core' cd , then yeah, we should
>> remove it, but the last time I did a full up archinstall, it was NOT
>> on the cd, so I am willing to bet that we can remove it easily enough
>> too if it has been added into the install cd.
>
> Archlinux currently offers
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:34:17 +0100
solsTiCe d'Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when i go to http://ftp.archlinux.org/, i got a site like the one
> showing up at http://www.response-o-matic.com/
>
> should it be the ftp site of archlinux.org ?
As Dan said, this is a shared server. We're borrowi
On Dec 19, 2007 1:09 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:34 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi.
> > when i go to http://ftp.archlinux.org/, i got a site like the one showing up
> > at http://www.response-o-matic.com/
> >
> > should it be the ftp site
On Dec 19, 2007 11:34 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi.
> when i go to http://ftp.archlinux.org/, i got a site like the one showing up
> at http://www.response-o-matic.com/
>
> should it be the ftp site of archlinux.org ?
There is no need to look behind the curtain...ignore the
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 11:54 +0100, Attila wrote:
> On Samstag, 15. Dezember 2007 09:43 Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
>
> > That is allright, but why abort "makepkg" on non-authorized architectures?
>
> It seems that makepkg test only right or wrong because a "arch=(aai686
> aax86_64" brings the same
> BTW, *IF* arch is putting this on the 'core' cd , then yeah, we should
> remove it, but the last time I did a full up archinstall, it was NOT on
> the cd, so I am willing to bet that we can remove it easily enough too if
> it has been added into the install cd.
Archlinux currently offers two ins
hi.
when i go to http://ftp.archlinux.org/, i got a site like the one showing up
at http://www.response-o-matic.com/
should it be the ftp site of archlinux.org ?
Hey Greg and the gang;
Two comments inserted at the appropriate points below;
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:41:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Nonetheless, IF there is no clearly defined license especially when no
>> license document is extent on stuff that is meant to be used freely
>> (a
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:arch-general-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Hussam Al-Tayeb
> Verzonden: woensdag 19 december 2007 9:31
> Aan: General Discusson about Arch Linux
> Onderwerp: Re: [arch-general] Packages with non free licenses
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 09:32 +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> - You may only redistribute the fonts in their original form (.exe or
> .sit.hqx) and with their original file name from your Web site or
> intranet site.
> As far as i can tell after reading the above, Archlinux's way of
> distribut
15 matches
Mail list logo
