On Dec 1, 2007 12:10 AM, Michael Towers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently posted a feature request for the aufs dependency on
> aufs-utils to be removed (because the latter is not necessary for using
> aufs). The bug was closed by the maintainer because "This is the
> standard way of packagin
I recently posted a feature request for the aufs dependency on
aufs-utils to be removed (because the latter is not necessary for using
aufs). The bug was closed by the maintainer because "This is the
standard way of packaging modules in Arch:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Kernel_Module_P
On Sat, December 1, 2007 04:46, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i've searched a while and found nothing. And AFAIK there isnt't an
> chance to do this. But maybe one of you know a trick, a magic...
>
> Is it possible to change either the kernel version (what uname -r says)
> or the location of t
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:57:44PM -0500, Adam Vogt wrote:
> Might I suggest changing the order of the mkinitcpio hooks?
Thanks for the suggestion, but that won't work because the encrypt hook deals
only with the root partition. I've got it working now by changing the resume
hook to create the sw
Might I suggest changing the order of the mkinitcpio hooks? Perhaps if
encrypt happens before resume, the resume image will stand a better chance
of being decrypted. Then again, I havn't used encryption.
* On Thursday, November 29 2007, Felix Leckow wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just did a fresh Arch instal
Am Freitag, 30. November 2007 18:46:54 schrieb Gerhard Brauer:
> Anyone knows a trick?
Afaik there were some suggestions at the bug tracker. Imho a solution that
does not use pacman is not that great. If you really need a backup kernel you
can package a working one and install it side by side to
On Nov 30, 2007 4:04 AM, Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Freitag, 30. November 2007 02:34 Rodrigo Coacci wrote:
>
> > Anyone else or its just me?
>
> I think everyone has it at the moment: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8780
>
> If you like RSS feeds you can read the bugreports with your fa
Hello,
i've searched a while and found nothing. And AFAIK there isnt't an
chance to do this. But maybe one of you know a trick, a magic...
Is it possible to change either the kernel version (what uname -r says)
or the location of the kernel modul dir at boottime?
I think about an easy solution t
On Freitag, 30. November 2007 02:34 Rodrigo Coacci wrote:
> Anyone else or its just me?
I think everyone has it at the moment: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8780
If you like RSS feeds you can read the bugreports with your favorite reader
and sometimes earlier than you recognize them.:)
See you
On Nov 30, 2007 11:47 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isn't rocket surgery.
We need an engine transplant, STAT!
Holy crap people... this got way out of hand. We're discussing a footer.
a footer
This isn't rocket surgery. We either have it, or we don't. I turned it
off on this list as a trial.
Frankly, I like it simply because it's 4 less lines I have to remove
when editing quotes. I do like the archive li
On Friday 30 November 2007, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> I don't know why people sing their emails when sending to a public mailing
> list. Who checks all the keys and imports them?
I may wanna know who the sender trully is, right? I agree that is many times
not important but... it *can* be important.
Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't know why people sing their emails when sending to a public mailing
> list. Who checks all the keys and imports them?
That's indeed a good point.
But all my emails get signed by default. And I think, that's not bad.
--
Gruß, Johannes
Täglich http://bl
Graziano Giuliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 07:59 +0100, Johannes Held wrote:
> [...]
> > /opt/arch32/opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-2.0.0.10/firefox-bin: ELF 64-bit LSB
> > executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, dynamically
> > linked
> [...]
>
> 64 bit executa
Am Freitag, 30. November 2007 15:21:11 schrieb bardo:
> I think that by "intrusive" people meant "breaking gpg signatures". If
> that's the case, I'm with them.
I don't know why people sing their emails when sending to a public mailing
list. Who checks all the keys and imports them?
--
archlinu
2007/11/30, Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, I see it is a matter of taste so my opinion may be different than
> you. But if a 4 word footer is intrusive, then maybe signatures should
> be disallowed as well. No one really needs to know what company X works
> for or what his/her GNU/Linux
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 07:59 +0100, Johannes Held wrote:
[...]
> /opt/arch32/opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-2.0.0.10/firefox-bin: ELF 64-bit LSB
> executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, dynamically linked
[...]
64 bit executable in 32bit chroot?
--
Graziano Giuliani <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 14:45 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Friday 30 November 2007, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> > A simple "ArchLinux General Mailing List" footer looks professional
>
> Does it need to look professional? Or do we only need the list to be
> functional?
>
> > and is non intr
On Friday 30 November 2007, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> A simple "ArchLinux General Mailing List" footer looks professional
Does it need to look professional? Or do we only need the list to be
functional?
> and is non intrusive.
Well, I disagree. Many people have pointed it to be intrusive too ;)
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 08:28 -0500, Travis Willard wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 8:20 AM, Vinay Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 6:41 PM, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > It will look more elegant that way
On Nov 30, 2007 8:20 AM, Vinay Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 6:41 PM, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > It will look more elegant that way.
> > Let's use html-email with fancy logos and background images.
> > :-)
>
> And
On Nov 30, 2007 6:41 PM, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It will look more elegant that way.
> Let's use html-email with fancy logos and background images.
> :-)
And something flash based! how can you forget flash???
--
Vinay S Shastry
http://v
Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It will look more elegant that way.
Let's use html-email with fancy logos and background images.
:-)
--
Gruß, Johannes
Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut.
http://cryptocd.eduforge.org/online_version
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 14:37 +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> I would prefer keeping at least one line
>
> Greg
Yes, please keep at least one line that indicates the mailing list. It
will look more elegant that way.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I would prefer keeping at least one line
Greg
pgpNWPcnNUrUf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
There is a very old version of gnome-system-tools (and
system-tools-backends) package in [unstable]. A newer one is already
available in [community].
Would it not be better to remove the older one? What would be the procedure
to do that? I tried to contact the packager but i got no response s
> actually i noticed this problem since the beginning as i installed arch
> whatever key i use for binding xfc4-popup-menu there are problems.
> Problems when like... the menu opens only after.. 10-20 keypresses
> sometimes it doesn't
you may want to read this bug report:
http://bugzilla.xfce.org
On Nov 30, 2007 7:09 AM, Marc Deop i Argemí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 30 November 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > Ok... well - how about this - I shut it off, as a trial, on this list.
> > Anyone want to yell about it?
>
> Great!
>
+1!
No more deleting footers for me! :-)
--
Cheers,
On Friday 30 November 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Ok... well - how about this - I shut it off, as a trial, on this list.
> Anyone want to yell about it?
Great!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
29 matches
Mail list logo
