"R. Dale Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, sure looks much better that way.
*thumbs up*
--
Gruß, Johannes
Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut.
http://cryptocd.eduforge.org/online_version
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
"Rodrigo Coacci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Anyone else or its just me?
Here too.
But additionaly, in my arch32-chroot, I get this funny message:
$ LANG=C dchroot -d firefox
(arch32) firefox
/opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-2.0.0.10/run-mozilla.sh: line
166: /opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-2.0.0.10/firefox-bin: No
On Nov 30 05:09, _saiko wrote:
> Also don't know where to look for some output
> Xorg logs don't show anything weird :/
_saiko,
Take a look at the output of "xev" when you press the key(s) and
see if that will help you solve the problem.
--
Antony Jepson / <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / 0xFA10ED80
pgp8
Hi all
actually i noticed this problem since the beginning as i installed arch
whatever key i use for binding xfc4-popup-menu there are problems.
Problems when like... the menu opens only after.. 10-20 keypresses
sometimes it doesn't
interestingly enough when firefox is maximised then the menu
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Ok... well - how about this - I shut it off, as a trial, on this list.
Anyone want to yell about it?
Well, sure looks much better that way.
On Nov 29, 2007 7:34 PM, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone else or its just me?
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8795
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ]$ LANG=C sudo pacman -S firefox
resolving dependencies... done.
looking for inter-conflicts... done.
Targets: firefox-2.0.0.10-2 <--
Total Package Size: 9.36 MB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
checking package integrity... done.
cleaning up... don
On Nov 29, 2007 7:36 PM, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WE HATE YOU! -+ :)
> |
> V
>
>
> ___
> arch-general mailing list
> arch-general@archlinux.org
On Thu 2007-11-29 21:36 , slubman wrote:
> Le Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:17:49 +0100,
> Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > "Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > How does it break GPG/MIME? Just curious.
> > GPG/MIME encrypts/signs the WHOLE email. Subject, body and
> > attachments and
On Thursday 29 November 2007, slubman wrote:
> I want the footer to stay, cause it add a rapid link/way to go to the
> html archive of the list.
Man! Set a bookmark in your browser! ;)
Anyway...what's the point of the footer? Anybody knows? If it's useless...we
should get rid of it.
Damnshock
On Nov 29, 2007 2:36 PM, slubman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want the footer to stay, cause it add a rapid link/way to go to the
> html archive of the list.
I personally agree, but trimming it down 2 lines or so might be doable
___
arch-general maili
Le Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:17:49 +0100,
Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> "Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > How does it break GPG/MIME? Just curious.
> GPG/MIME encrypts/signs the WHOLE email. Subject, body and
> attachments and attaches this to an new email.
> Mail programm notices
"Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How does it break GPG/MIME? Just curious.
GPG/MIME encrypts/signs the WHOLE email. Subject, body and attachments and
attaches this to an new email.
Mail programm notices that and shows the attached mail as original mail.
Thinking about it - the footer would b
On Nov 28, 2007 3:37 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Petar Bogdanovic schrieb:
> > Would it be possible to remove the [arch-general] prefix from the
> > subject line? It seems pretty useless to me since there are a lot of
> > other headers on which a filter can be based on. The same
Am Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:33:36 +0200
schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i would vote for getting rid of the footer as well if thats an option.
> or at least shorten it a bit. its irritating when people quote & quote
> without removing it.
But that's not a problem of the footer.
That's
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:15:28PM +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> 2007/11/29, Jeff Mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Nov 28, 2007 4:37 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The prefix in the subject is fine, but can we please drop the footer?
> > > It's annoying and breaks GPG/MIME.
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 15:24 +, Felix Leckow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just did a fresh Arch install with encrypted /, /home, and swap partitions,
> following the LUKS Encrypted Root[1] how-to in the wiki. I have trouble
> getting suspend-to-disk (using uswsusp[2] from AUR) to work: creating
> the su
Hi,
I just did a fresh Arch install with encrypted /, /home, and swap partitions,
following the LUKS Encrypted Root[1] how-to in the wiki. I have trouble
getting suspend-to-disk (using uswsusp[2] from AUR) to work: creating
the suspend image works fine, but I can't resume for the simple reason tha
2007/11/29, Jeff Mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Nov 28, 2007 4:37 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The prefix in the subject is fine, but can we please drop the footer?
> > It's annoying and breaks GPG/MIME.
>
> +74
>
> I hate the footer.
>
+1337! :P
--
Roman Kyrylych (Роман К
19 matches
Mail list logo
