Hey everyone,
I internally proposed Konstantin Gizdov to become a developer for his
sustained good work on Arch Linux and the need to touch some [extra]
packages sometimes. I'm pleased to announce that he has now become a
full developer. All the relevant steps have been completed and he should
I took armagetronad and the cataclysms.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 25.03.24 09:10, Robin Candau wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm writing this mail as proposal to increase the default
`vm.max_map_count` [1] value in Arch Linux.
The default `vm.max_map_count` 65530 value is making some Windows games
crash (or even prevent them to start at all) while being played
On 14.07.24 21:14, Florian Pritz wrote:
Hi,
Sadly I have no longer had the time necessary to properly handle master
key holder and packager duties for a while now. I don't feel like it's
fair to you guys and our users to keep this up any longer so I'm
officially resigning now.
Most pressing top
A new RFC (request for comment) has been opened here:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/40
Please visit the above link for discussion.
Summary: Our package sources currently do not have explicit licenses.
This RFC proposes to license all Arch Linux package sources und
An RFC has now entered its Final Comment Period. In 14 days, discussion
will end and the proposal will either be accepted, rejected or withdrawn:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/40
Please visit the above link for discussion.
Summary:
Our package sources currently do
On 03.09.24 13:30, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
An RFC has now entered its Final Comment Period. In 14 days, discussion
will end and the proposal will either be accepted, rejected or withdrawn:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/40
Please visit the above link for
Hey all,
There's been some discussion about this via chat but no action has been
taken. Some time ago, ollama-gemma2-2b was uploaded to [extra] which has
caused some discussion for various reasons.
I'm not writing this mail to address or open up the discussion for
ethical or political concer
On 03.09.24 13:42, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 03.09.24 13:30, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
An RFC has now entered its Final Comment Period. In 14 days, discussion
will end and the proposal will either be accepted, rejected or withdrawn:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs
On 13.11.24 05:53, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Hey all,
There's been some discussion about this via chat but no action has been
taken. Some time ago, ollama-gemma2-2b was uploaded to [extra] which has
caused some discussion for various reasons.
I'm not writing this mail to address
On 03.01.25 21:07, Morten Linderud wrote:
Yo,
Today I noticed that the "License package sources" RFC contained an amended 0BSD
license that added a two paragraph exception for patch files and other auxiliary
files. The purpose of this change is to ensure the license is not covering other
files i
Hey,
The git/community-to-extra migration was almost two years ago. Back
then, we left the [community] repository and friends
([community-staging], [community-testing]) in place (though empty) so
that users would have an easier time migrating.
They've sat there unused for a long time now and
On 07.02.25 16:11, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Hey,
The git/community-to-extra migration was almost two years ago. Back
then, we left the [community] repository and friends ([community-
staging], [community-testing]) in place (though empty) so that users
would have an easier time migrating
On 14.02.25 19:11, Robin Candau wrote:
On 2/14/25 6:49 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Hey all,
Yo Sven,
in an earlier thread [0], I proposed cleaning up the unused repos from
repos.archlinux.org.
They've become unused and stagnant after the git migration almost two
years ago.
We kept
Hey all,
in an earlier thread [0], I proposed cleaning up the unused repos from
repos.archlinux.org.
They've become unused and stagnant after the git migration almost two
years ago.
We kept them around so it wouldn't break setups of users that tried to
get the repository sync databases with an
On 07.02.25 16:23, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 07.02.25 16:11, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Hey,
The git/community-to-extra migration was almost two years ago. Back
then, we left the [community] repository and friends ([community-
staging], [community-testing]) in place (though empty) so that
Hey all,
lahwaacz made a service for collecting and displaying manpages from our
packages that we now operate at man.archlinux.org.
I believe this is news-post worthy.
---
Title: man.archlinux.org is live
We are happy to announce our newest public service: A manual pages
indexing site at [m
On 13.01.21 00:12, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Hey all,
lahwaacz made a service for collecting and displaying manpages from our
packages that we now operate at man.archlinux.org.
I believe this is news-post worthy.
---
Title: man.archlinux.org is live
We are happy to announce our newest
On 13.01.21 00:16, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:12:05AM +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase via
arch-dev-public wrote:
While there are other man page indexing sites out there, it is our hope that
publishing man pages that match the version of our released
Hey everyone,
A new sponsorship term for dragon (our build server for those who
weirdly enough don't know) was coming up and as the box was getting
pretty slow for 2021 I felt perhaps we should also try for an upgrade.
Anyway so Hetzner kindly agreed to give us a sponsorship deal for a
bigge
On 14.01.21 20:40, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Hey everyone,
A new sponsorship term for dragon (our build server for those who
weirdly enough don't know) was coming up and as the box was getting
pretty slow for 2021 I felt perhaps we should also try for an upgrade.
Anyway so Hetzner k
Hello all,
A new bigger and badder build box is now available to all packagers at
build.archlinux.org. home dirs (but not .cache) have been transferred to
the new box from dragon and all users should have access.
The new box, as previously mentioned, is roughly twice as fast as dragon
and ha
On 18.01.21 01:40, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 14.01.21 20:40, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Hey everyone,
A new sponsorship term for dragon (our build server for those who
weirdly enough don't know) was coming up and as the box was getting
pretty slow for 2021 I felt perhaps we should als
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 23:13, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 23:34, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
> > Options realistically are:
> >
> > 1) bump the baseline
> > 2) provide a second more optimized port.
>
> 3) defer this until better tooling is av
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 at 15:17, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public
wrote:
>
> On 3/14/21 3:07 PM, Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > I just updated the server to also accept x86_64 feature levels, ARM
> > and even i686. There is a new version of pkgstats (>= 3.1.0; currently
> > in [testi
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021, 22:05 Daniel M. Capella via arch-devops <
arch-dev...@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> On June 23, 2021 4:01:06 PM EDT, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public <
> arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Today mailman was moved to a dedicated vps, making gi
On 06.10.21 12:47, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 27/9/21 4:33 am, David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote:
An RFC has now entered Final Comment Period. In 14 days, discussion will
end and the proposal will either be accepted, rejected or withdrawn:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlin
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 15:17, Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public <
arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 2:49 PM Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
> > Assuming we need people to help the x86_64_v3 port, I would post a news
> > item and have people apply. We
On 31.01.22 21:25, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public wrote:
We’ve wanted automatic flagging packages out of date for a while and
currently every packager has to come up with it’s own solution. Let’s
solve this centralized by integrating nvchecker into archweb.
nvchecker is a program whic
On 03.02.22 12:53, David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote:
Hi all,
while trying to use the arch-projects mailing list for an announcement I
realized, that it is (probably?) not really supposed to be used for
that at the moment.
It explicitly states to be used for development discussion and pro
30 matches
Mail list logo
