Hey everyone,
As part of the implementation of RFC 40 [0], we're about to start
sending out emails to everyone who has previously contributed to any of
our package sources in any capacity.
We have gathered around 5000 unique emails and will space sending out
over a few days to make sure we d
Hey all,
after our previous email to ADP, some of you suggested a news post might
be warranted in addition to the notification to ADP which we agree with.
I'm happy to hear any feedback on the draft below. You can find a live
version with incorporated feedback in a pad at [0].
---
Title: Pr
On 03.01.25 21:07, Morten Linderud wrote:
Yo,
Today I noticed that the "License package sources" RFC contained an amended 0BSD
license that added a two paragraph exception for patch files and other auxiliary
files. The purpose of this change is to ensure the license is not covering other
files i
On 06.01.25 16:10, Morten Linderud wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 03:49:09PM +0100, Rafael Epplée wrote:
Thanks for taking the initiative on this!
No worries!
Adding REUSE.toml files to all package sources will be tricky to automate.
With REUSE, we'll have to explicitly specify licens
