On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 07:23:34PM +0100, Frederik Schwan via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Subject: News draft: Archlinux mailing list id changes
^
Should be "Arch Linux". Rest looks good!
--
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:12:05AM +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase via
arch-dev-public wrote:
> While there are other man page indexing sites out there, it is our hope that
> publishing man pages that match the version of our released packages makes
> Arch more accessible and that it improves our docume
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 09:20:04PM +0200, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> If people are still concerned about angering Google, even though
> there's probably nothing illegal about bundling Chrome's keys (when
> also considering the aforementioned permission from 2013) then let's
> j
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 01:23:58AM +0200, Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> I am not sure how this would be taken, but I propose we not only remove
> it from the repos, but we clean the AUR of Chromium and Chrome too and
> we enforce no one uploads any more such variants. This, I beli
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:19:09AM +0200, Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On 1/27/21 1:31 AM, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > I disagree on utilzing the AUR for an extended turf-war. Drop it from the
> > repositories and people can maintain it in the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:19:10PM +0100, David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote:
> This first RFC is rather special, as it is meant to bootstrap the
> process and introduce it for adoption (while the process is actually not
> yet in place). Therefore I am skipping the "Final Comment Period" on the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:45:02PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em fevereiro 15, 2021 15:27 Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public escreveu:
> >
> > A general concern is "who has access to the repository"? Can anyone take the
> > template and submit an RFC th
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:38:06PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em fevereiro 15, 2021 18:54 Morten Linderud escreveu:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:45:02PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> > > Em fevereiro 15, 2021 15:27 Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public escreveu:
&
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:40:58AM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini via
arch-dev-public wrote:
> Em fevereiro 17, 2021 11:13 Christian Hesse escreveu:
> > Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public
> >
> > on Wed, 2021/02/17 10:51:
> > > All official kernels of Arch Linux now support zstd compressed init
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:00:38AM +, Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 20:52 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > I'd hate to be the dbscripts maintainer who implements that! Also,
> > $arch in mirror URLs would likely have issues, as it would need
Yo!
As people know python2 has been unsupported for a year and we current have ~170
python2 packages in our repositories. Currently the removal has been fairly slow
and done a bit ad-hoc. There has been a todo list but the follow up to that has
not really been great and I think it's reasonable for
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:46:52PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On 3/15/21 2:10 PM, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Yo!
> >
> > As people know python2 has been unsupported for a year and we current have
> > ~170
> > pyt
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:39:12PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> FYI,
>
> A list of packages in our repository that require python2 but are not
> required by anything else:
>
> wesnoth
> wifite
> android-tools
> arduino
> dia
> geda-gaf
> ghidra
> gif2png
> john
> opensip
On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias via
arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 10:43:38PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa via
> arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've introduced a new group "archlinux-tools" for arch-rebuild-order and
> > orhun will add it
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:00:34AM +0200, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Today I've updated archlinux.org with some interesting changes for
> packagers. Two new reports have been added:
>
> * A new report which includes all required orphan packages in our
> repositori
Yo!
It seems like gnupg 2.3.1-1 was built and pushed to [testing] briefly before
being removed. The reason from the removal is because there are changes to how
gnupg verifies signatures that depends on the key UIDs being properly signed.
In the case of my key, "foxbo...@archlinux.org" is of margi
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 08:28:24AM -0400, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Hi Morten,
>
> Thanks for the summary.
Yoo!
Thanks for explaining :)
> On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 13:31:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Why was this removed with no headsup? It caused a fair bi
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:15:50PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I'd also like to query why 2.3.x was packaged at all? From the 2.3
> series announcement:
>
> "We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release:
> version 2.3.0. This release marks the start of pu
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 12:38:39AM +0200, Jonas Witschel via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On 2021-05-16 00:28, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > I would like to welcome Jonas Witschel (diabonas) among the Arch Linux
> > Developers.
> >
> > Jonas has been a Trusted User s
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 12:45:13AM +0200, Morten Linderud wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 12:38:39AM +0200, Jonas Witschel via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > On 2021-05-16 00:28, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > > I would like to welcome Jonas Witschel (diabonas)
Yo Andrzej :)
I hope you are doing fine despite the circumstances!
I adopted a few of your packages when you announced this in October. I'm just
going to paste the current list of your packages missing a co-maintainer so
people have a list.
I'll probably try pick up a bunch of the python-* stuff
Yo!
Sunday evening I'm heading for a cabin trip where we don't have water and
electricity is all solar power my dad rigged up a couple of years ago :) It's
going to be great. I'm also moving from Bergen to Oslo next weekend! I need to
spend some time to settle inn I expect I'll do less upkeep on m
Yo,
I packaged up the new Go release yesterday and moved it over to stable earlier
today.
Usually new Go minor releases frequently include new compiler improvements and
some assorted runtime changes. Previous releases I have done complete rebuilds
of Go packages in our repositories but the recep
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 08:34:45AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Hi,
> short summarize from irc:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware
> xz -C crc32 is the only supported mode
>
> mkinitcpio needs to be patched:
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 07:24:58PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 8/10/21 6:01 pm, David Runge wrote:
> > Starting a discussion about the length and form of the Code of Conduct
> > *after* not interacting with the own changes to the Code of Conduct that
> > would fix it, *after*
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 09:40:24PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 8/10/21 9:31 pm, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 07:24:58PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> >> On 8/10/21 6:01 pm, David Runge
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:27:12PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 17/11/21 22:03, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > ## DBScripts
> >
> > There has been great progress on debug support for dbscripts , review
> > and testing is very much appreciated. [1]
>
> I rev
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 05:43:44PM +0100, Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> seems to have happened again: the desc file of lxqt-runner had 0
> bytes. I re-added the package. I got the following output. I did not
> get the "...was not locked" message when trying again. Maybe
Just an additional headsup as we are on the topic of "LTO fun"; it seems like
any Go packages utilizing cgo/the external linker seems to be just broken with
LTO.
The error looks like:
net._cgo_3c1cec0c9a4e_C2func_getaddrinfo: relocation target
_cgo_3c1cec0c9a4e_C2func_getaddrinfo not defined
Ple
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:12:37PM +0100, David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote:
> If you have gained more than or equal to three main key signatures for
> your new PGP key and the key as well as those signatures are already
> available in the keyring in [core] please rebuild all of your packages
>
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 04:57:00PM -0800, Brett Cornwall via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On 2022-01-14 21:12, David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > To all that have added a new @archlinux.org UID or have created a new
> > key, please make sure that all signatures you have received from main
> >
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:12:30AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Is there any particular objection to requiring packagers upload both
> architectures?
I'm personally not really motivated doing the required builds. We have an
underdeveloped infrastructure which hasn't changed sinc
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:22:32AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 29/1/22 11:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:12:30AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> > > Is there any particular objectio
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:45:57AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 29/1/22 11:28, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:22:32AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> > > On 29/1/22 11:13, Morten Lind
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:53:41PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 29/1/22 22:11, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:45:57AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> > > On 29/1/22 11:28, Morten Lind
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 06:22:29PM +0100, Kristian Klausen via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Signing:
> - SSHing to a restricted UNIX user with ForceCommand=signing-script
> - All signing operations are logged
> - Only signing requests from gemini's WireGuard IP address is allowed
Some general thought
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 09:35:07AM -0800, Brett Cornwall via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On 2022-01-29 15:16, Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 2:49 PM Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> > > Assuming we need people to help the x86_64_v3 port, I would pos
I'm very happy to announce that debug packages in Arch Linux has been deployed
:)
This work began after FOSDEM 2020 and was announced in November 2020. However
because of time constraints it took quite a while before we managed to deploy
it.
Currently we have a debuginfod service which is capabl
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:02:46PM +0100, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public
wrote:
>
> [5) Why don't we care about ARM and OpenRISC at all? Aren't we riding
> pretty dead horses here just for very minor improvements?]
ALARM has refused to join the project because of our ancient tooling. RISC is
b
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 02:00:51PM +0100, Maxime Gauduin via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 20:17 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-
> >
> > This wouldn't really be too much of an issue if we had proper automation.
> > With automation, this exact problem solves itself to a deg
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:49:29PM +0100, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo wrote:
> hi
>
> thanks for the work!
Thanks!
> one question. This thing works, for example, if I build one of the packages
> with debug package in the arch debuginfod site with my custom flag for
> disable an option/feature. the debug pa
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:59:34PM +0100, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo wrote:
> El dom, 30 ene 2022 a las 20:54, Morten Linderud ()
> escribió:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:49:29PM +0100, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo wrote:
> > > hi
> > >
> > > thanks for the work!
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > > one question. This thing w
(Sorry for the offlist spam. I'm too quick and forget to remove the CC :c)
--
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:55:07PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 31/1/22 23:23, David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > given recent topics for build automation and work on internal projects I
> > would like to announce a code walkthrough for arch-repo-manag
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:20:35AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 12:59, Kristian Klausen via arch-dev-public wrote:
> >
> > We have three sponsored machines, which are used as package mirrors and
> > archive mirrors[1].
> > At the time of writing they have 14T
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 03:55:44AM +, George Rawlinson via arch-dev-public
wrote:
>
> I have no objections to this, and happily support this endeavour.
>
> However, I currently track 8 packages via shell scripts (available via
> nvchecker's "cmd" source), all found here[0].
>
> Some of them
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 03:54:03PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> did some initcpio optimizing lately and implemented correct symlink
> handling. This saves already some space.
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/73439
>
> Now one major problem left in recent initc
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> next topic to step up: Secure Boot support
> I wanted to bring this up to the mailing list to collect all info about the
> status of SB support.
> There are different approaches on how to implement
Hi,
This is an updated news entry for the debug package announcement. We have been
working on the system and provided a few repositories for the debug repositories
as well.
I'll post this when we have an updated "Getting traces" article ready :)
# Debug packages and debuginfod
We are very happy
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 11:07:29PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 4/2/22 22:49, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public wrote:
> >
> > * How do I create a debug package?
> >
> > Add 'debug' to the options array in your PKGBUILD, bump pkgrel and
> > rebuild. This should result in
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 11:28:02AM +0100, Xyne via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the recent discussions about possibly adding support for x86_64-v3 the
> general consensus seemed to be that we need to first work on our packaging
> infrastructure (build pipelines, reproducible builds, etc.).
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:24:03PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> As I said, I'm happy the discussion around this RFC is public and open. But
> if this is a big enough change for an RFC, then it almost certainly needs to
> go through the TU voting procedure.
I'd be happy with havi
52 matches
Mail list logo
