On 1/26/21 6:23 PM, Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public wrote:
I am not sure how this would be taken, but I propose we not only remove
it from the repos, but we clean the AUR of Chromium and Chrome too and
we enforce no one uploads any more such variants. This, I believe, is
the only way the me
On 2/17/21 6:18 AM, Christian Hesse via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> upstream util-linux replaced the current implementation of hardlink (which we
> do not ship) with Debian's [0]. For util-linux 2.37 I plan to package the
> hardlink executable and set provides, conflicts and repl
On 3/2/21 7:54 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 2/3/21 9:51 pm, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A new RFC has been opened here:
>> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/2
>>
>> Summary:
>> Make -march=x86_64-v2 the default for our packages. This assumes th
On 3/2/21 8:10 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 3/3/21 11:03 am, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> I wonder, might this be an interesting time to reintroduce multiple
>> architectures?
>>
>> We used to offer i686 and x86_64.
>>
>> May
On 3/2/21 9:12 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 3/3/21 11:56 am, Filipe Laíns wrote:
>> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 11:10 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>>> On 3/3/21 11:03 am, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>>>> I wonder, might
On 3/7/21 8:40 AM, Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> While I am at it, I'd like to also support different ARM architectures
> provided by archlinuxarm.org (or maybe even i486/i686 by
> archlinux32.org). There is a small catch though and the reason I am
> asking for your opinion: While we
On 3/4/21 6:33 AM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 3/3/21 10:54 am, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> On 2/3/21 9:51 pm, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> A new RFC has been opened here:
>>> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/2
>>>
>>> Summary:
>>>
On 3/15/21 2:10 PM, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Yo!
>
> As people know python2 has been unsupported for a year and we current have
> ~170
> python2 packages in our repositories. Currently the removal has been fairly
> slow
> and done a bit ad-hoc. There has been a todo list but
It's that time of year again, the Passover holiday, so I'll be
irregularly available or simply offline for days at a time until April 6
or thereabouts. I'll try to catch up with messages when I get a chance
(expect delays!), but I'll be getting very little actual work done.
Please feel free to bum
