On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 03:49:09PM +0100, Rafael Epplée wrote:
>
> Thanks for taking the initiative on this!
No worries!
> Adding REUSE.toml files to all package sources will be tricky to automate.
> With REUSE, we'll have to explicitly specify license and copyright for *all
> files* in the sourc
On 1/6/25 3:49 PM, Rafael Epplée wrote:
Let's consider going with a less explicit way to specify licensing info,
and drastically reduce the work involved:
- Add a LICENSES folder with the original 0BSD text inside
- Instead of REUSE.toml, use the same piece of prose in every repo to
specify wh
On 03.01.25 21:07, Morten Linderud wrote:
Yo,
Today I noticed that the "License package sources" RFC contained an amended 0BSD
license that added a two paragraph exception for patch files and other auxiliary
files. The purpose of this change is to ensure the license is not covering other
files i
