Amending RFC40 to remove custom 0BSD license

Yo, Today I noticed that the "License package sources" RFC contained an amended 0BSD license that added a two paragraph exception for patch files and other auxiliary files. The purpose of this change is to ensure the license is not covering other files in the repository that the author can't licen

Re: Amending RFC40 to remove custom 0BSD license

On 03.01.25 21:07, Morten Linderud wrote: Yo, Today I noticed that the "License package sources" RFC contained an amended 0BSD license that added a two paragraph exception for patch files and other auxiliary files. The purpose of this change is to ensure the license is not covering other files i

Re: Amending RFC40 to remove custom 0BSD license

On January 3, 2025 3:00:06 PM CST, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >On 03.01.25 21:07, Morten Linderud wrote: >> Yo, >> >> Today I noticed that the "License package sources" RFC contained an amended >> 0BSD >> license that added a two paragraph exception for patch files and other >> auxiliary >>

Re: Amending RFC40 to remove custom 0BSD license

On 03.01.25 at 21:07 (UTC+0100), Morten Linderud wrote: > Yo, > > Today I noticed that the "License package sources" RFC contained an amended > 0BSD > license that added a two paragraph exception for patch files and other > auxiliary > files. The purpose of this change is to ensure the license i