Re: RFC - thoughts about Arch and init freedom?

2022-12-19 Thread Christian Hesse
Andreas Radke on Fri, 2022/12/16 22:46: > The older Arch developers may remember vaguely how Arch has introduced > [1] and migrated to systemd [2] becoming the new and only supported init > system. [...] I remember these days, though I was a regular user back then. :) The biggest argument again

Re: Upcoming PHP 8.2 update and introduction of legacy packages

2022-12-19 Thread Jelle van der Waa
Hey, On 17/12/2022 11:13, Pierre Schmitz wrote: With the release to PHP 8.2 I will introduce a new set of packages to solve most of the issues with PHP updates. There are two valid requirements: On one hand people need the latest version to use its features or to develop new applications. And on

Re: Upcoming PHP 8.2 update and introduction of legacy packages

2022-12-19 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 3:40 PM Jelle van der Waa wrote: > I don't object against providing an older PHP but why is it named > php-legacy? We don't really have a policy for this, but it feels > inconsistent versus the current php7, ruby2.7 package. (Ofcourse > nodejs-lts-gallium is then also incon

Re: RFC - thoughts about Arch and init freedom?

2022-12-19 Thread Connor Behan
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 8:01 AM Christian Hesse wrote: > Andreas Radke on Fri, 2022/12/16 22:46: > > The older Arch developers may remember vaguely how Arch has introduced > > [1] and migrated to systemd [2] becoming the new and only supported init > > system. [...] > > I remember these days, th