1) -1 for bringing new packagers onboard just due to the lack of
automatic rebuilds.
2) For me 2 of my 3 systems are only x86-64-v2 so I won't be able to
test anything seriously. So I'm out of the game if v3 is the new
default. Both systems are fast enough for many more years. So there's
no plan t
I'm very happy to announce that debug packages in Arch Linux has been deployed
:)
This work began after FOSDEM 2020 and was announced in November 2020. However
because of time constraints it took quite a while before we managed to deploy
it.
Currently we have a debuginfod service which is capabl
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:02:46PM +0100, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public
wrote:
>
> [5) Why don't we care about ARM and OpenRISC at all? Aren't we riding
> pretty dead horses here just for very minor improvements?]
ALARM has refused to join the project because of our ancient tooling. RISC is
b
On 2022-01-30 12:13:45 (+0100), Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> ALARM has refused to join the project because of our ancient tooling.
Case in point. :)
--
https://sleepmap.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 30.01.2022 12.08, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
I'm very happy to announce that debug packages in Arch Linux has been deployed
:)
This work began after FOSDEM 2020 and was announced in November 2020. However
because of time constraints it took quite a while before we managed to
So I just build the 437 packages (pkgbase) and let my computer compile
for just 25 hours. The initial results can be seen here
https://md.archlinux.org/s/t8HOyhNOi
Currently there are 27 packages in [core]/[extra] and 92 in
[community] that do not build. I did not check the logs for every
package
On 30/1/22 21:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:02:46PM +0100, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public
wrote:
[5) Why don't we care about ARM and OpenRISC at all? Aren't we riding
pretty dead horses here just for very minor improvements?]
ALARM has refused t
On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 20:17 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-
public wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 15:17, Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public <
> arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 2:49 PM Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> > > Assuming we n
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 02:00:51PM +0100, Maxime Gauduin via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 20:17 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-
> >
> > This wouldn't really be too much of an issue if we had proper automation.
> > With automation, this exact problem solves itself to a deg
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:49:29PM +0100, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo wrote:
> hi
>
> thanks for the work!
Thanks!
> one question. This thing works, for example, if I build one of the packages
> with debug package in the arch debuginfod site with my custom flag for
> disable an option/feature. the debug pa
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:59:34PM +0100, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo wrote:
> El dom, 30 ene 2022 a las 20:54, Morten Linderud ()
> escribió:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:49:29PM +0100, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo wrote:
> > > hi
> > >
> > > thanks for the work!
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > > one question. This thing w
(Sorry for the offlist spam. I'm too quick and forget to remove the CC :c)
--
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
12 matches
Mail list logo
