Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-08 Thread David Runge via arch-dev-public
On 2021-10-08 09:44:56 (+1000), Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 7/10/21 1:41 am, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public wrote: > > On 06.10.21 12:47, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > >> On 27/9/21 4:33 am, David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote: > >>> An RFC has now entered Final

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-08 Thread Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
On 8/10/21 6:01 pm, David Runge wrote: > On 2021-10-08 09:44:56 (+1000), Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: >> On 7/10/21 1:41 am, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public wrote: >>> On 06.10.21 12:47, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: On 27/9/21 4:33 am, David Runge via arch-dev-public

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-08 Thread Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 07:24:58PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 8/10/21 6:01 pm, David Runge wrote: > > Starting a discussion about the length and form of the Code of Conduct > > *after* not interacting with the own changes to the Code of Conduct that > > would fix it, *after*

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-08 Thread Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public
Hi Allan, Too many things are being touched on here, and it's become a stagnant discussion where little progress has been made. Firstly, you are correct that the current GitLab login requires you to accept the CoC. In an attempt to remedy this situation, given the current software constraints and

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-08 Thread Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
On 8/10/21 9:31 pm, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 07:24:58PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public > wrote: >> On 8/10/21 6:01 pm, David Runge wrote: >>> Starting a discussion about the length and form of the Code of Conduct >>> *after* not interacting with

[arch-dev-public] RFC: Rename the Trusted User role

2021-10-08 Thread Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public
A new RFC (request for comment) has been opened here: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/7 Please visit the above link for discussion. Summary: It is shown in some cases that the Trusted User role naming leads to some confusion and misunderstanding in broader contexts o

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-08 Thread Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
On 8/10/21 9:39 pm, Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public wrote: > Firstly, you are correct that the current GitLab login requires you to > accept the CoC. In an attempt to remedy this situation, given the > current software constraints and the risk of being seen as condescending > (although that i

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-08 Thread Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 09:40:24PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 8/10/21 9:31 pm, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 07:24:58PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public > > wrote: > >> On 8/10/21 6:01 pm, David Runge wrote: > >>> Starting a di