On Mon May 12, 2025 at 11:26 AM PDT, Bert Peters wrote:
Hi all,
The list has gone quiet, so I think it's appropriate to gauge sentiment
and I'm going to do so in the only way I have: tallying comments. A few
different options have been proposed
* Keep it in the repos, avoid depending on it g
Hi all,
The list has gone quiet, so I think it's appropriate to gauge sentiment
and I'm going to do so in the only way I have: tallying comments. A few
different options have been proposed
* Keep it in the repos, avoid depending on it going forward. This is
supported by Torxed, kpcyrd, and m
Hi,
On 03/05/2025 15:09, Frederik Schwan wrote:
So how do we proceed?
I agree with Morten, that Redis upstream has proven itself abolutely unreliable.
I propose we exclude redis from the official repos for one year, after which
we can reevaluate its status.
Contining to aintain Redis will only r
On May 3, 2025 1:24:31 PM EDT, Campbell Jones wrote:
>
>
>On May 3, 2025 10:09:19 AM EDT, Frederik Schwan wrote:
>>On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Bert Peters wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> A while ago we as a distro decided to stop supporting Redis, due to
>>> their licence change [1],
On May 3, 2025 10:09:19 AM EDT, Frederik Schwan wrote:
>On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Bert Peters wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A while ago we as a distro decided to stop supporting Redis, due to
>> their licence change [1], and move to Valkey. Through a combined
>> effort, we removed al
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Bert Peters wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A while ago we as a distro decided to stop supporting Redis, due to
> their licence change [1], and move to Valkey. Through a combined
> effort, we removed all direct dependencies on redis, replacing them
> with vault and p
On 5/2/25 5:04 PM, Bert Peters wrote:
Now I know that this is not a universally shared opinion, so please
consider this email an invitation for discussion on what we should be
doing here.
I think as long as 1) there's nothing preventing us from packaging it
and 2) there's a maintainer willing
On 5/2/25 11:04 AM, Bert Peters wrote:
Hi all,
A while ago we as a distro decided to stop supporting Redis, due to
their licence change [1], and move to Valkey. Through a combined
effort, we removed all direct dependencies on redis, replacing them
with vault and patching until that worked. The
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Bert Peters wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A while ago we as a distro decided to stop supporting Redis, due to
> their licence change [1], and move to Valkey. Through a combined
> effort, we removed all direct dependencies on redis, replacing them
> with vault and p
On 5/2/25 5:04 PM, Bert Peters wrote:
This seems to me the Arch way: pragmatic and user
central.
Now I know that this is not a universally shared opinion, so please
consider this email an invitation for discussion on what we should be
doing here.
Hi.
As you say, this sounds like a pragmatic w
10 matches
Mail list logo
