Re: Git packaging sources: state of the art

2023-01-10 Thread Jelle van der Waa
Hey, On 10/01/2023 16:05, David Runge wrote: On 2023-01-08 12:13:36 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote: On 05/01/2023 23:15, Levente Polyak wrote: # Introduction [1] https://github.com/archlinux/archweb/issues/438 @jelle Maybe I misunderstand your last paragraph, but isn't this the case curr

Re: Git packaging sources: state of the art

2023-01-10 Thread David Runge
On 2023-01-08 12:13:36 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 05/01/2023 23:15, Levente Polyak wrote: > > # Introduction > > > > Behold, ~~winter~~ Git is coming. We've been working on and off to get > > Git packaging sources ready for a while now. Today I'd like to outline > > the final proposal

Re: Git packaging sources: state of the art

2023-01-08 Thread Jelle van der Waa
Hey! On 05/01/2023 23:15, Levente Polyak wrote: # Introduction Behold, ~~winter~~ Git is coming. We've been working on and off to get Git packaging sources ready for a while now. Today I'd like to outline the final proposal regarding the action plan, workflow, tooling and also the reason for

Re: Git packaging sources: state of the art

2023-01-06 Thread Morten Linderud
Thanks for writing the email Levente :) I had some hopes to have a test deployment of the new setup ready in December, but time escaped me. The idea is to try have something packagers can try and work with before this is actually deployed. I'll announce it when I get around to finalizing it :) -