Thanks, everyone, for the feedback on the matter!
The concerns are clearer to me now, and I've given this a bit more thought.
> it's important to specify how the moderation capabilities are.
My initial idea was to use a configuration like this (with some parts
stripped):
```
[server]
max_conte
On 01-09-2024 12:26, Levente Polyak wrote:
Sep 1, 2024 11:49:46 Morten Linderud :
I think it's important to specify how the moderation capabilities are. Public
paste services are *bounds* to be abused and can distribute malicious files and
illegal files. This needs to be dealt with and should p
Sep 1, 2024 11:49:46 Morten Linderud :
> I think it's important to specify how the moderation capabilities are. Public
> paste services are *bounds* to be abused and can distribute malicious files
> and
> illegal files. This needs to be dealt with and should probably not cause too
> much friction
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 11:56:30AM GMT, Orhun Parmaksiz wrote:
> Hey all!
>
> As some of you might already know, I maintain an upload server project
> called `rustypaste`:
> https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/rustypaste/
>
> I’ve been using it daily for a couple of years now and have bee
On 2024-09-01 11:56:30 (+0300), Orhun Parmaksiz wrote:
> The other day, I started wondering why Arch Linux shouldn't support a
> similar public service, like https://paste.ubuntu.com, but powered by
> rustypaste. I believe we could configure rustypaste to allow public
> uploads with a retention per
