Em maio 11, 2021 9:28 Lukas Fleischer via arch-dev-public escreveu:
Hi Morten,
Thanks for the summary.
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 13:31:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
Why was this removed with no headsup? It caused a fair bit of confusion for a
few people and the cause of this issu
On 11/5/21 11:20 pm, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:15:50PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
>> I'd also like to query why 2.3.x was packaged at all? From the 2.3
>> series announcement:
>>
>> "We are pleased to announce the availability of
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:15:50PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I'd also like to query why 2.3.x was packaged at all? From the 2.3
> series announcement:
>
> "We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release:
> version 2.3.0. This release marks the start of pu
On 11/5/21 10:28 pm, Lukas Fleischer via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hi Morten,
>
> Thanks for the summary.
>
> On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 13:31:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> Why was this removed with no headsup? It caused a fair bit of confusion for a
>> few people and the cause of
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 08:28:24AM -0400, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Hi Morten,
>
> Thanks for the summary.
Yoo!
Thanks for explaining :)
> On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 13:31:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Why was this removed with no headsup? It caused a fair bit of confusion for
Hi Morten,
Thanks for the summary.
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 13:31:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Why was this removed with no headsup? It caused a fair bit of confusion for a
> few people and the cause of this issue isn't very clear when packaged fail to
> verify. Ideally we shoul
