Hi,
On 17/12/2021 04:42, Xyne via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 2021-12-16 19:53 +1000
Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
Assuming that dependent library is not used elsewhere in the package,
and the extra library had a provide of its library version, then this
would add an extra dependency.
On 2021-12-16 19:53 +1000
Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>Assuming that dependent library is not used elsewhere in the package,
>and the extra library had a provide of its library version, then this
>would add an extra dependency.
>
>There are several options:
>1) disable autodeps - thes
On 16/12/21 13:24, Xyne via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 2021-12-15 16:40 +1000
Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
The dependencies added are purely sonames that the binary are explicitly
linked to. So the binary will be non-function without libraries
providing that exact soname. Thus all the
On 2021-12-15 16:40 +1000
Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>LIB_DIRS is specified in makepkg.conf, not in PKGBUILDs. Given
>usr/lib/ is not even standard for 64bit libraries, I do not want to hard
>code anything.
I somehow completely missed the part where you explicitly said it would be
On 15/12/21 14:11, Xyne via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 2021-12-13 18:35 +1000
Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
Hi all,
I submitted a patchset to pacman that I would like some packager
feed-back on. [1]
Essentially this replaces the old libdepends/libprovides system into
something akin to
On 2021-12-13 18:35 +1000
Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I submitted a patchset to pacman that I would like some packager
>feed-back on. [1]
>
>Essentially this replaces the old libdepends/libprovides system into
>something akin to that used by APK. In short, makepkg.conf wil
